期刊文献+

中小学德育中的校长角色探析——基于结构—功能主义理论的阐释

Exploring the Role of Principals in Moral Education in Primary and Secondary Schools——An Interpretation Based on Structural-Functionalism Theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 校长德育角色定位存在学理和实践上的双重困境,理论研究的不足和实践操作中的角色混乱问题共同制约着校长角色功能的发挥。为解决这一问题,文章采用结构—功能主义的分析框架,将校长置于学校德育行动系统中探讨校长的角色和功能。在结构—功能主义视角下,校长在学校德育人格系统、社会系统和文化系统中角色定位分别为德育愿景领导者和德育质量监评者,课程教学领导者、校内事务管理者和公共关系协调者,师生行为示范者和文化环境营造者。三大系统中七种德育角色相互交织、相互支持、相互制约和控制,共同致力于校长在学校德育行动系统中发挥达标、整合和维模功能,以推动学校德育目标的实现。 The positioning of the principal’s role in moral education faces a dual dilemma in terms of theory and practice.Both the lack of theoretical research and the confusion of roles in practice collectively constrain the role function of the principals.To address this issue,this paper adopts the structural-functionalism analytical framework,putting the principals into the school’s moral education action system to explore the roles and functions of principals.In the structural functionalism perspective,the principal’s roles in the personality system,social system and cultural system of school moral education are defined as moral vision leader and moral quality supervisor,curriculum leader,school affairs manager and public relations coordinator,teachers and students behavior demonstrator and cultural environment builder.The seven moral education roles in the three systems interweave,support,constrain and control each other.They work together to play the functions of goal attainment,integration and maintenance in the school moral education action system to promote the realization of school moral education goals.
作者 张毓格 李敏 ZHANG Yuge;LI Min(Department of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062;Shanghai Teacher Education College,Shanghai 200234,China)
出处 《教育参考》 2023年第6期48-54,共7页 Education Approach
关键词 德育 校长角色 结构—功能主义 Moral Education Principal’s Role Structural-Functionalism
作者简介 张毓格,华东师范大学教育学系硕士研究生,主要从事教育基本理论和德育研究。;李敏,上海市教师教育学院副研究员,教育学博士,主要从事学校管理、教师专业发展和德育研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1A. Comte, System of Positive Polity: London: Longmans Green, 1975, pp. 241~242.
  • 2H.Spencer, The Principles of Sociology, Volume 1, New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1925, p. 505.
  • 3T. Parsons, Working Papers in the Theory of Action,New York: Free Press, 1953; T. Parsons, Economy and Society, New York: Free Press, 1956; T. Parsons, Sociological Theory and Modern Society, New York: Free Press, 1967.
  • 4R. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure, New York:Free Press, 1968.
  • 5Jeffrey Alexander, "Neofunctionalism: AnIntroduction",in Alexander, ed. , Neofunctionalism, Sage, 1985, pp. 7~20;"Neofunctionalism Today: Reconstructing a Theoretical Tradition, with P. Colomy", in G. Ritzer, ed. , Frontiers of Sociological Theory, Columbia University Press, 1990, pp. 33~67.
  • 6高宣扬.当代社会理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
  • 7贾春增.外国社会学史[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.272.
  • 8[美]乔纳森·H.特纳著,邱泽奇等译.社会学理论的结构[M].北京:华夏出版社,2006.39.39.
  • 9[法]达尼洛·马尔图切利著,姜志辉译.现代性社会学[M].南京:译林出版社,2007.53.73.73.50.65.59.
  • 10[英]克里斯·希林,菲利普·梅勒著,李康译.社会学何为?[M].北京大学出版社2009.21.113.118.121.125.119.124.113.

共引文献234

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部