摘要
认罪认罚作为量刑情节在从宽适用中存在诸多难题,当前从宽理论与解决方案对于认罪认罚的激励不足。认罪认罚从宽是宽严相济刑事政策的具体化,是实体与程序互动的奖励性量刑情节,被追诉人主体性地认罪认罚和真诚悔罪是奖励的根据和标准。在立体的认罪认罚奖励性从宽行为激励模型中,最大从宽幅度由原来的认罪认罚转变成悔罪行为激励下的认罪认罚,能够容纳更多类型的认罪认罚的行为方式。刑罚目的存在惩罚、预防与奖励的界分,基于修复受创的社会关系、促进社会团结的考虑可以突破责任刑的下限,给予被告人更多的宽大和优待。应当增加第三个调节基准刑的阶段,单独考察认罪认罚、真诚悔罪以及由此对于受创社会关系的修复程度,并给予刑罚裁量上的从宽奖励。
There are several problems in leniency of pleading guilty if it is regarded as a sentencing circumstance,and current leniency theoriesand its solutions only have insufficient incentive on pleading guilty.Leniency of pleading guilty is theconcretizationof criminal policy of coordinating punishment with leniency,and is a sentencing circumstance of incentive leniency with interaction of substantial and procedure law,andincentivebasis and standard is the subjective pleading guilty and sincererepentance.In the stereo model of incentive leniency of pleading guilty,maximum leniency gives to pleading guiltywith repentanceratherthan ordinary pleading guilty,and morebehaviorways of pleading guilty are included.The purpose of penalty has demarcationof punishment,prevention and reward.On account of repairingsocial relationsharmed by crime and promoting social cohesion,leniency of pleading guilty could break through the limit of penalty oriented by culpability,and defendant can obtain more leniency and preferential treatment.So the third step of adjusting benchmark penalty should beset up,pleading guilty,sincere repentance and repairing social relations should be consideredindependently,and more incentive leniency should be granted.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第6期58-69,共12页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金项目(22BFX042)“预防性犯罪治理模式研究”。
关键词
认罪认罚
奖励性从宽
刑罚机理
行为激励
pleading guilty
inventive lenient
punishment mechanism
behavior incentive
作者简介
刘军,上海政法学院刑事司法学院教授,博士生导师。
