期刊文献+

辅助生殖技术应用的女权主义理解及启示 被引量:1

Feminist Understanding and Enlightenment of the Application of Assisted Reproductive Technologies
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 女权主义对辅助生殖技术的态度虽然复杂多变,但其中存在三种明显的倾向:拒绝技术、接纳技术以及一种调和的中间立场,它典型地体现在第二波女权主义、第三波女权主义以及女权主义最近的“物质转向”上。这三次对辅助生殖技术的回应,反映了女权主义科学技术研究的思想进展,尤其是其“物质转向”,超越了生物本质主义和社会建构主义之间的二元对立,将辅助生殖技术置于自然-文化、物质-话语系统进行分析,并思考其中存在的伦理和政治问题,这对思考辅助生殖技术的应用具有重要的启发意义。 Although feminist attitudes towards assisted reproductive technologies(ARTs)are complex and not static,there are three distinct tendencies:rejection of technology,acceptance of technology and a conciliatory middle ground,respectively expressed in feminist Second Wave,Third Wave and resent"material turn".These three responses to ARTs reflect the ideological progress of feminist science and technology study.In particular,its"material turn",beyond the dual oppositions between biological essentialism and social constructivism,tends to analyze the ARTs in the natural-cultural and materialdiscoursal system and think about the ethical and political issues in it.This understanding will have some important enlightening significances for our thinking of ARTs.
作者 朱彦明 ZHU Yan-ming(School of Philosophy and Social Development,Huaqiao University,Xiamen 361021,China)
出处 《医学与哲学》 北大核心 2023年第10期39-43,共5页 Medicine and Philosophy
基金 2022年国家社会科学基金一般项目(22BZX091)。
关键词 女权主义 辅助生殖技术 新物质主义 feminism assisted reproductive technology new materialism
作者简介 朱彦明(1972-),男,博士,教授,研究方向:生命伦理学。E-mail:zhuyanming2003@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1Bloomington and Indianapolis. Sex/Machine: Readings in Culture, Gender, and Technology [ C]. Indiana University Press, 1998.
  • 2Suchman L. Review: Wajcman Confronts Cyberfeminism [ J ] Social Studies Of Science,2006,36 (2) : 322.
  • 3Fauldner W. The Technology Question in Feminism:A View From Feminist Technology Studies [ J ]. Women' s Studies International Forum, 2001,24( 1 ) :80,81.
  • 4Wajcman J. Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State is the Art? [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, 2000,30(3) :456.
  • 5Lohan M. Constructive Tension in Feminist Technology Studies [J]. Social Studies of Science,2000,30 (6) :902, 900, 895 - 909.
  • 6Trevor J. Pinch and Wiebe . Bijker. The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, 1984,14 ( 3 ) : 399 - 432.
  • 7Wajcman J. Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State is the Art? [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, 2000,30(3) :451.
  • 8Grint K, Woolgar S. On Some Failures of Nerve in Constructivist and Feminist Analyses of Technology [ J ]. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 1995,20 (3) :287.
  • 9桑德拉·哈丁.科学的文化多元性:后殖民主义、女性主义和认识论[M].夏侯炳,谭兆民,译.南昌:江西教育出版社.2002:175-178.
  • 10Haraway D. Situated Knowledges : The Science Question in Feminism and The Privilege of Partial Perspective [ J ]. Feminist Studies, 1988,14(3 ) :581.

共引文献24

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部