摘要
我国假释案件审理程序至今尚未真正被纳入诉讼程序,程序启动完全由刑罚执行机关掌控,诉讼主体功能运行失位与错位并存,裁判权异化为审查权,现行裁判程序和裁判逻辑难以保证裁决结果的正当性。如何通过程序运作保障假释案件实质化审理是亟待解决的问题。假释案件审理程序之所以运行失范,主要源于价值定位上“权力”而非“权利”的制度设定、在诸多诉讼主体眼中呈现不同面相的认识因素、实体条件判断复杂和诉讼运行规则缺失的规范因素以及配套机制不够健全的机制因素。因此,应当秉承从“奖励说”到“权利说”的基本理念,确立规范程序运作,防止司法腐败的制度目标,建构有别于普通刑事案件的审理程序,从诉讼模式的对抗式改造转向协作为主的二元司法模式,明确审理模式而非审查模式的功能定位,通过多元诉讼程序的选择与分流,实现假释案件的实质化审理。
The trial procedure of parole cases in China has not really been included in the litigation procedure,for its initiation is completely controlled by the penalty execution organ.As a result,the function of the litigation subject has been lost and misplaced,the power of judgment is alienated into the power of review,and the current adjudication procedures and logic can not guarantee the legitimacy of the trial results.How to ensure the realization of substantive trial of parole cases through procedural operation has become an urgent problem to be solved.The reason behind the problem is mainly due to the system setting of“power”rather than“right”in value orientation,the cognitive factors that parole has different faces in the eyes of many litigation subjects,the normative factors that the judgment of substantive conditions is complex and the litigation operation rules are missing,and the mechanism factors that the supporting mechanism is flawed.So,we should prefer the notion of“right”to that of“reward”,set the system objectives of standard procedure and judicial corruption prevention,and create a trial procedure,different from that of ordinary criminal cases,that shifts from the adversarial transformation of the litigation mode to the dual judicial mode based on cooperation.We should establish the functional orientation of the trial mode rather than the review mode.Thus,through the choice and diversion of multiple proceedings,we can realize the substantive trial of parole cases.
作者
孙海燕
Sun Haiyan(School of Law,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)
出处
《江苏大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2023年第3期87-100,共14页
Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFC0831104)。
关键词
假释
实质化审理
程序保障
二元司法模式
多元诉讼程序
功能定位
parole
substantive trial
procedure guarantee
dual judicial model
multiple litigation procedure
functional positioning
作者简介
孙海燕,南京大学法学院博士研究生,从事刑事诉讼法学研究。
