期刊文献+

责任与自由:康德实践理性概念的规范性阐释 被引量:2

Responsibility and Freedom:Normative Interpretation on Kant’s Concept of Practical Reason
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于规范性哲学理念和负责任判断视角,我们可以对康德实践理性概念做出更加融贯契合的理解,进而消除形而上学论证的不彻底性。人类智性的绝对自发性表征了责任与判断的深层关联,也在此意义上,康德的实践理性观念表达了具有普遍立法意志彼此担责的道德人格能力,并主张基于社会理由空间建构负责任的伦理和政治共同体,捍卫和提升平等自由价值。康德还主张,实践理性既作为推动人类发展的动力之源,也在自然历史的合目的性进程中得以生成和完善,进而不断引导和切实推进人类秩序的规范性建构。因此,在历史发展中不断增强以实践理性为基本内核的道德人格禀赋,在艰辛劳作中不断创建和改善人类社会文明形态,是我们应该承担的重大责任和使命。 Kant’s concept of practical reason can be understood more coherently based on the idea of normative philosophy and perspective of responsible judgment, thereby eliminating the incompleteness of metaphysical argument. The absolute spontaneity of human intelligence represents the in-depth link between responsibility and judgment, and in this sense, Kant’s concept of practical reason expresses the power of moral person with a universal legislative will and mutual accountability, then he claimed that the construction of a responsible ethical and political community should be based on the space of social reasons, thereby defending and promoting the value of equality and freedom. Kant also argued that practical reason, as the source of impetus for human development, generated and perfected in the purposive process of natural history, continuously guided and effectively promoted the normative construction of human order. Therefore, it is a great responsibility and mission that we should undertake to continuously enhance the moral personal endowment with practical reason as the basic core in the historical development, and to continuously create and improve the civilized forms of human society by hard work.
作者 卞绍斌 BIAN Shaobin(School of Humanities,Southeast University,Nanjing,Jiangsu,China,211189)
出处 《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2023年第2期1-12,共12页 Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
基金 2018年国家社科基金一般项目“罗尔斯政治哲学的康德式基础研究”(18BZX112) 2020年教育部后期资助重大项目“康德政治哲学研究”(20JHQ003)。
关键词 康德 实践理性 自由 责任 规范 Kant practical reason freedom responsibility normativity
作者简介 卞绍斌,男,江苏灌云人,博士,东南大学人文学院哲学与科学系教授、博士生导师。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献3

共引文献22

同被引文献19

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部