摘要
司法人员对同一客观事实可能有不同的判断,进而会影响法律适用。同案同判考察的是检察人员的法律素养,同案不同判考察检察人员的良心与智慧。司法实践中的“同案不同判”现象值得我们反思,是法律保护出现了真空地带还是检察人员对案件的理解不同?不同的理论模型、社会发展及法律变迁、司法人员对客观事实认识的差异是造成这一现象的主要原因。坚持系统观念、法治思维、强基导向,重视“同案不同判”现象并寻找“异同”的解决之策,对适法统一有重要的促进作用。
Judicial officers may make different judicial decision on the same fact,which will affect the proper application of law.The same judicial decision on the same case tests procurators’ legal quality while the different judicial decision on the same case challenges procurators’ conscience and wisdom.The phenomenon of “different judgments on the same case” in judicial practice deserves our reflection.Is there a vacuum in legal protection,or do prosecutors have different understanding of the case?Different theoretical models,social development and legal evolution,and judicial officers’ different understanding of objective facts are the main rationales that contribute to this phenomenon.Adhering to the system conception,legal ideology and solid foundation orientation,paying attention to the phenomenon of “different judicial decision on the same case”and looking for solutions to “differences” will play an important role in promoting the unified application of the given laws.
作者
张强
朱清枫
Zhang Qiang;Zhu Qingfeng(Shanghai Railway Transportation Procuratorate,Shanghai 200070,China;Shanghai Police College,Shanghai 200137,China)
出处
《上海公安学院学报》
2022年第2期85-89,共5页
Journal of Shanghai Police College
关键词
同案不同判
法律事实
包容评价
Different Judicial Decision on the Same Case
Legal Facts
Inclusive Evaluation
作者简介
张强(1988-),男,上海铁路运输检察院检察官助理,主要研究方向为刑法学;朱清枫(1968-),男,上海公安学院法律教研部讲师,研究方向为治安管理、刑事诉讼法学。
