摘要
由于与英美和欧陆国家的司法传统与司法实践均存在较大差异,因此,在中国讨论后果与后果考量,必须以中国的司法实践为基础。一方面,后果考量基于规范,受规范约束,因此,切不可离开规范而言后果;另一方面,后果考量与传统法律方法互为补充,一起在司法实践的不同面向发挥作用,共同型构出整全的司法过程,是人民法院多样性职能的具体体现。“规范”和“职能”视角的分析展现了后果考量生发和运作的具体情境及其制度属性,也证明了单纯从形式角度认识后果考量的不足。当然,正因为后果考量与“规范”和“职能”密切相关,因此,法官必须在规范和职能范围内进行后果考量,后果考量的作用方式必须得到严格框定,以促使其更好地发挥应有作用。
Due to the large differences in judicial traditions and judicial practices with Common Law and Civil Law, the discussion of consequences and consequences consideration in China must be based on Chinese judicial practice. On the one hand, the consequences consideration is based on norms and is bound by norms. Therefore, the consequences must not be separated from the norms. On the other hand, the consequences consideration and traditional legal methods complement each other, play a role in different aspects of judicial practice, and jointly construct a complete judicial process, which is a concrete embodiment of the diversified functions of the people’s courts. The analysis from both normative perspective and functional perspective reveals the specific situation and institutional attributes of consequence consideration, and also proves the deficiency of understanding the consequences consideration purely from perspective of forms. Of course, because the consequences consideration is closely related to norms and functions, judges must consider the consequences within the scope of the norms and their functions. And the action mode of consequence consideration must be strictly framed in order to promote its better play its due role.
出处
《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期137-148,共12页
Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金
云南省哲学社会科学规划项目(省社科研究基地项目)“基层人民法院应对‘案多人少’的实践经验与完善对策研究”(YB2021038)。
关键词
司法
后果考量
社会效果
法律方法
法律适用
Judicial
Consequences consideration
Social effect
Legal method
Application of law
作者简介
张剑源,云南大学法学院教授(昆明650504)。
