关注学习进阶彰显学科核心素养——鲁科版高中化学新教材《化学反应原理》编写思路及使用建议被引量：3

Focus on Learning Progression and Explicit Discipline Core Competencies:Compilation Thought and Suggestions for Senior High School Chemistry Textbook Principles of Chemical Reaction Published by Shandong Science and Technology Press

原文传递

导出

摘要基于2017年版高中化学课程标准的要求,分析了化学反应原理模块学科核心素养发展内涵及其进阶。从内容结构组织、活动性栏目设计、情境素材选取与使用、微项目设置和习题评价系统设计等方面,阐述了鲁科版高中化学反应原理新教材编写思路,并提出新教材的使用建议。 According to requirements of the senior high school chemistry curriculum standards(2017 edition),this paper analyzes the connotation of the development of discipline core competencies and learning progression.From the aspects of the content structure organization,the design of activity column,the selection and use of situation,the micro-project setting and the design of exercise evaluation system,the paper illustrates the writing thought of the senior high school chemistry textbook Principles of Chemical Reaction published by Shandong Science and Technology Press,and puts forward some suggestions on its usage.

作者支瑶王磊王明召 ZHI Yao;WANG Lei;WANG Ming-Zhao(Beijing Haidian Teachers Training College,Beijing 100195,China;College of Chemistry,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区北京市海淀区教师进修学校北京师范大学化学学院

出处《化学教育（中英文）》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第1期2-10,共9页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education

关键词化学反应原理学习进阶学科核心素养编写思路使用建议 principles of chemical reaction learning progression discipline core competencies writing thought suggestions for use

分类号 G633.8 [文化科学—教育学]

作者简介通信联系人:王磊,E-mail:wangleibnu@126.com。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1王磊,于少华.对高中化学课程标准若干问题的理论阐释及实践解读[J].中学化学教学参考,2018,0(13):3-9. 被引量：40
2王磊,陈光巨.外显学科核心素养促进知识向能力和素养的转化——北京师范大学“新世纪”鲁科版高中化学新教材的特点[J].化学教育（中英文）,2019,0(17):9-19. 被引量：71
3王磊,魏锐.学科核心素养发展导向的高中化学课程内容和学业要求——《普通高中化学课程标准(2017年版)》解读[J].化学教育（中英文）,2018,39(9):48-53. 被引量：145
4王磊,支瑶.化学学科能力及其表现研究[J].教育学报,2016,12(4):46-56. 被引量：148
5胡久华,王磊.促进学生无机物认识方式的持续进阶——鲁科版高中化学必修新教材无机物主题编写思路及使用建议[J].化学教育（中英文）,2021,42(1):2-8. 被引量：11

二级参考文献28

1于少华,林博娇,王磊,王京苏,赫丽萍.化学核心素养背景下的元素化合物教学改进[J].化学教育（中英文）,2020,0(5):60-65. 被引量：18
2George,K. D. A comparison of the critical-thinking abili- ties of science and non-science majors. Science and Edu- cation, 1967,51 ( 1 ), 11-18.
3Novak, J. D. An approach to the interpretation and measurement of problem solving ability. Science and Ed- ucation, 1961,45 (2) : 122-131.
4Stuessy, C, L. Path analysis: A model for the develop- ment of scientific reasoning abilities in adolescents. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1989,26 (1): 41-53.
5Stieff, M. Improving representational competence using molecular simulations embedded in inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011,48 (10) : 1137-1158.
6Pine,J. , Aschbacher, P. ,Roth, E. ,Jones,M. , et al. Fifth graders' science inquiry abilities: A comparative study of students in hands-on and textbook curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2006,43 (5) : 467-484.
7Kuhn, D. Teaching and learning science as argument. Science and Education, 2010,94 (5) : 810-824.
8Teichman, L. The ability of science students to make conclusions. Science and Education, 1944, 28 (5): 268- 279.
9Lawson, A. E. , Blake, A. J. D. Training Effects and Generalization of the Ability to Control Variables in High School Biology Students. Science and Education, 1975,59(3) :387-396.
10National Research Council. National science education standards[ED/OL]. Available from : http ://www. nap. edu/catalog/4962, html, 1996.