摘要
“窃取”网络虚拟财产行为的定性分歧主要集中在计算机犯罪和财产犯罪之间,在计算机犯罪内部也存在不同意见。应当认清网络虚拟财产的电磁记录之本质,不能因为其可能具有的经济价值而认为其是财产,“窃取”网络虚拟财产的行为不能被定性为盗窃罪。“窃取”网络虚拟财产是“改变”数据而非“获取”数据,因此应以破坏计算机信息系统罪规制。
The differences in the characterization of“stealing”online virtual property are mainly between computer crime and property crime,and there are also different opinions within computer crime.The nature of electromagnetic records of network virtual property should be recognized,and it cannot be considered as property because of its possible economic value,and the act of“stealing”network virtual property cannot be characterized as theft.The act of“stealing”network virtual property is to“change”data rather than“obtain”data,so it should be regulated by the crime of damaging computer information systems.
作者
刘纯燕
LIU Chunyan(Zhongnan University of Economics,Political Science and Law,Wuhan,Hubei 430073)
出处
《山西警察学院学报》
2021年第4期13-18,共6页
Journal of Shanxi Police College
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“中国刑法立法现代化的理论基础与路径选择研究”(18AFX013)阶段性成果。
关键词
窃取
网络虚拟财产
电磁记录
改变数据
破坏计算机信息系统罪
stealing
network virtual property
electromagnetic recording
change of data
the crime of damaging computer information system
作者简介
刘纯燕(1995-),女,河南洛阳人,中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院刑法学博士研究生,主要研究方向为刑法学。
