摘要
对于非法占有加密货币的行为,部分法院以加密货币不属于财物为由,对行为人以计算机犯罪定罪。此类判罚忽略了加密货币的财物属性,与刑法体系与理论学说相悖,有违罪刑法定原则,存在量刑畸轻之嫌。以财产犯罪为主线对类似行为定罪,既无司法障碍,又能及时充分地保护加密货币持有者的利益,减少社会成本,并充分评价行为人的行为结果,也便于犯罪形态的判断。犯罪数额可参照加密货币市场价格确定。
Regarding the illegal possession of cryptocurrency,some courts have convicted the perpetrators of computer crimes on the ground that cryptocurrency does not belong to property.This kind of sentence ignores the property attribute of cryptocurrency,which contradicts the criminal law system and theory,violates the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime,fails to deter potential crimes,and creates additional social cost.There are no judicial obstacles to take property crime as the main principle to convict similar acts,which can be utilized to fully protect the interests of cryptocurrency holders in time,evaluate the nature of the perpetrators’behavior,avoid additional social cost,and facilitate the judgment of crime forms.The amount of crime can be determined by referring to the market price of the cryptocurrency.
作者
谢丹夏
黄京磊
Xie Danxia;Huang Jinglei(School of Social Science,Tsinghua University,100084)
出处
《制度经济学研究》
2020年第4期-,共16页
Research on Institutional Economics
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目“数字平台动态对社会福利与金融稳定的影响”(71973076)
“大宗商品定价的新风险因子”(71973075)的阶段性成果
作者简介
谢丹夏,清华大学社会科学学院副教授,博士生导师,地址:北京市海淀区清华大学明斋205,电子邮箱:xiedanxia@tsinghua.edu.cn;黄京磊,清华大学社会科学学院博士研究生,地址:北京市海淀区清华大学学生公离27号楼218。
