期刊文献+

反制国内法域外适用的工具:阻断法的经验及启示 被引量:12

Counteracting Extraterritorial Application of Foreign Law:Experience of Blocking Statute and Its Implication
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 阻断法(Blocking Statute)是各国自20世纪开始着手建立的应对美国法域外适用的法律工具,经历了阻断程序到阻断实体的历史发展过程,如今成为了禁止外国特定法律以及依据这些特定法律做出的行为在一国境内产生效力的法律统称。然而,阻断法的发展经验表明,由于阻断法本身会使本国政府与私主体均陷入一种“两难境地”,其执行难以得到有效落实,进而与外国主权强制原则和国际礼让原则的理论联系减弱,使得相关主体难以依靠阻断法在美国法庭上提出有效抗辩。这些阻断法发展过程中所积累的经验教训也给中国的阻断立法和执行带来了一定启示,对未来更好地回应美国单边经济制裁起到了重要作用。 Blocking Statute is a legal tool that countries have begun to establish since the 20th century to deal with the application outside the United States.It has gone through the historical development process from blocking procedures to blocking entities,and now it has become the prohibition of specific foreign laws and based on these specific laws.Acts made by law are collectively referred to as laws that are effective in a country.However,the development experience of the blocking law shows that because the blocking law itself will cause both the domestic government and private subjects to fall into a“dilemma”,its implementation is difficult to be effectively implemented,and it is further in line with the theories of foreign sovereignty coercive principles and international comity principles.The weakening of ties makes it difficult for relevant subjects to rely on the blocking law to put forward effective defenses in US courts.The experience and lessons accumulated during the development of these blocking laws also bring some enlightenment to China's blocking legislation and law enforcement,and play an important role in better responding to US unilateral economic sanctions in the future.
作者 黄文旭 邹璞韬 HUANG Wen-xu;ZOU Pu-tao(School of Law, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081,China)
出处 《时代法学》 2021年第4期88-98,共11页 Presentday Law Science
基金 2017年度湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会课题(XSP17YBZC123)的成果。
关键词 阻断法 欧盟 外国主权强制原则 国际礼让原则 Blocking Statute EU foreign sovereignty compulsion doctrine international comity
作者简介 黄文旭,湖南师范大学法学院讲师,法学博士,主要研究方向:国际法;邹璞韬,湖南师范大学法学院,主要研究方向:国际法。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献117

  • 1沈春耀.[英国]1980年保护贸易利益法[J].环球法律评论,1985,7(2):69-72. 被引量:1
  • 2龚柏华,陈云.评述美国企业告中国维生素C企业“价格串通”违反美国反托拉斯法案[J].国际商务研究,2006,27(6):48-53. 被引量:2
  • 3"Presi- dency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council (21/22 June 2007)", Brussels, 23 June 2007, Annex I.
  • 4"Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union", 15 December 2001.
  • 5Paul Craig, "The Treaty of Lisbon: Process, Architecture and Substance", European Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2008, pp. 137-166.
  • 6Michael Dougan," The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: Winning Minds, Not Hearts", Common Market Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2008, pp. 617-703.
  • 7"Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community", OJ C306, 2007, "Preamble".
  • 8"Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union", OJ C325/5, 2002, Art. 1.
  • 9"Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union", OJ C325/5, 2002, Art. 3(l).
  • 10"Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union", OJ C325/5, 2002, Art. 3 (2).

引证文献12

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部