期刊文献+

“刑事—行政”案件移送要件研究 被引量:14

Study on the Elements of the “Criminal-administrative” Cases Transfer
原文传递
导出
摘要 新《行政处罚法》在原有"行政—刑事"衔接的基础上增加规定了"刑事—行政"衔接,从条文的字面文义以及隐含内容分析,"刑事—行政"衔接需要遵循实体与程序两方面的要件。实体要件包括违法行为、不需要追究刑事责任或者免予刑事处罚、应当给予行政处罚;程序要件主要涉及移送衔接中的"及时"要求、刑事证据在行政执法中的适用以及衔接过程中的监督。仅从规范角度分析,无论是实体要件,还是程序要件,在内涵与外延上都存在着不确定的解释空间,正式实施后,也必将面临着更多的困境。之所以如此,既与行政权与司法权的不同属性相关,也与我国法律责任体系的分工相关。为此,需要思考已有"行政—刑事"衔接机制能否适用于"刑事—行政"衔接中,如不能适用应尽快建立衔接机制。 The new Administrative Penalty Law,based on the original"administration-criminal" connection,adds more provisions on the"criminal-administrative" connection. By analyzing the literal meaning and implicit content of the provisions,the"criminal-administrative" connection needs to follow the elements of both substantiality and procedure. Substantial elements include(1)illegal acts;(2)no need to be investigated for criminal responsibility or exempt from criminal punishment;(3)need to be given administrative punishment. Procedural elements mainly involve the requirement of"timeliness" in the transfer,the application of criminal evidence in administrative law enforcement and the supervision in the connection process. From the perspective of provisions,there is uncertain space for interpretation in the connotation and extension of both substantial elements and procedural elements. And more dilemmas will come into being after the implementation of new Administrative Penalty Law. The reason for this is not only related to the different attributes of executive power and judicial power,but also related to the division of work in Chinese legal responsibility system. Therefore,it is necessary to consider whether the existing"administrationcriminal" connection mechanism can be applied to the"criminal-administrative" connection. If not,the connection mechanism should be established as soon as possible.
作者 练育强 Lian Yuqiang(the Administrative Reconstitution Research Center of East China University of Political Science and Law)
出处 《国家检察官学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第4期49-64,共16页 Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金 上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“行政公益诉讼构成要件之判断”(2018BFX009)的阶段性成果之一。
关键词 司法机关 行政机关 行政处罚 要件 困境 Judicial Organs Administrative Organs Administrative Penalty Elements Dilemmas
作者简介 练育强,华东政法大学行政复议研究中心教授。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献123

同被引文献217

引证文献14

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部