期刊文献+

美国青少年校园欺凌治理的多层路径解析 被引量:4

An Analysis of the Multi-layered Approaches toU.S. Youth School Bullying Governance
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国目前已实现对校园欺凌的法治化治理。官方机构通过统合理论研究中个人独立、隐私权保护等不同立场,合理限定校园欺凌的内涵与外延。在治理层面,美国由联邦到各州全面细化反欺凌立法的多层体系;以恢复性司法为指导,注重民事、刑事司法手段在欺凌冲突治理中的差异化应用;以学校为中心,打破“零容忍”政策壁垒,探索确立积极开放的欺凌干预策略和多元互补的欺凌治理模式。与美国相比,我国亟需改革现行法律体制,确立多层次立法模式,激活校园欺凌治理中的司法功能,完善行政机关的协同联动机制,探索建立符合青少年健康成长规律,旨在恢复青少年社区关系的多元欺凌干预机制。 The United States has achieved the rule of law on school bullying. The official institutions rationally limit the connotation and extension of bullying in the school through different standpoints such as individual independence and privacy protection in the integration theory research.At the governance level,the United States has comprehensively refined the antibullying multi-layered system from the federal to the states;guided by restorative justice,focusing on the differential application of civil and criminal justice methods in the management of bullying conflicts;taking the school as the center,breaking "Zero tolerance" policy barriers,exploring the establishment of active and open bullying intervention strategies and multiple and complementary bullying governance models. Compared with the United States,China urgently needs to reform the current legal system,establish a multi-layered legislative model,activate the judicial function in the management of bullying,improve the coordination mechanism of administrative agencies,and explore the establishment of a pluralistic model that is in line with the healthy growth of adolescents and restores adolescent community relations bullying intervention mechanism.
作者 李鑫 Li Xin(Changchun People’s Procuratorate of Jilin Province,Changchun Jilin 130028)
出处 《警学研究》 2020年第2期89-99,共11页 Police Science Research
基金 2019年度重庆市社会科学规划项目“重庆市中小学校园欺凌治理机制研究”(项目编号:2019YBFX028) 2020年度教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“中小学生欺凌治理的恢复性体制构建研究”(项目编号:20YJC820039)的阶段性成果。
关键词 校园欺凌 美国实践 反欺凌政策 恢复性司法 school bullying American practice anti-bullying policy restorative justice
作者简介 李鑫,吉林省长春市人民检察院第一检察部助理检察员。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献38

  • 1杨解君.法治的悖论[J].法学,1999(6):11-16. 被引量:21
  • 2支庭荣.财产权、人身权与新闻自由的法制化——对美国宪法第一修正案相关内容的一个纵向考察[J].新闻与传播研究,1999,6(1):67-73. 被引量:3
  • 3.《中国统计年鉴》[M].,1983.323页.
  • 4张庆方.恢复性司法研究[A].王平.恢复性司法论坛[C].北京:群众出版社,2005.
  • 5Brian Parsi Boetig. The Routine Activity Theory: A Model for Addressing Specific Crime Issues [ J ]. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 2006.
  • 6L. Cohen and M. Felson. Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach [J]. American Socio- logical Review, 1979.
  • 7[美]乔治·B·沃尔德,托马斯·J·伯纳德,杰弗里·B·斯奈普斯.理论犯罪学[M].方鹏译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
  • 8V. A. Henson, W. E. Stone, "Campus Crime: A Victimization Study", in Journal of Criminal Justice ( 1999), pp. 295 - 307.
  • 9E. E Mustaine, R. Tewksbury, "College Students' Lifestyles and Self - protective Behaviors: Further Considerations of the Guardianship Coneept in Routine Activity Theory", in Criminal Justice and Behavior (2003), p. 309.
  • 10张明楷.刑法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:860.

共引文献111

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部