摘要
个人数据保护领域的冲突规则以实现"数据保护"和"数据流通"的平衡为实质正义目标。为协调两者冲突以及增强法律选择的稳定性和可预见性,需以欧盟数据保护指令第4(1)(a)条为蓝本探索并完善该领域的专门冲突规则,在避免对控制人机构设立地标准扩张性解释的同时,辅之以数据主体惯常居所地法作为逃避条款。个人数据保护的私法纠纷以契约之诉和非契约之诉为承载,如何将个人数据保护的专门冲突规则与传统契约之诉、非契约之诉的一般冲突规则相协调成为重要的研究课题。我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第46条不能为数据权侵权之诉提供适当的冲突规则,需增加控制人机构设立地规则,并对受害人惯常居所地法的适用设置必要的限制条件。
The conflict rule in the field of personal data protection takes the balance between"data protection"and"data flow"as substantive justice purpose. In order to harmonize the conflict between the two values and enhance legal stability and predictability, special conflict rules in the field should be explored basing on the norm of the article 4(1)(a) of Directive 95/46/EC. It is necessary to avoid expanding explanations of the controller’s establishment norm, and supplement the law of data subject’s habitual residence as an escape clause. The private law disputes of personal data protection are based on contract and non-contract litigation.It becomes a significant research topic that how the special conflict rules of personal data protection coordinate with the traditional conflict rules of contract and non-contract litigation. Article 46 of law of the PRC on Application of Laws to Foreign-Related Civil Relations cannot provide appropriate conflict rules for the lawsuit of data right infringement. It is a good way to add the norm of the controller’s establishment and set necessary restrictions for the application of the law of the victim’s habitual residence.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期112-121,共10页
Seeking Truth
基金
山东省社会科学规划专项项目“大数据发展与跨境数据服务法律适用问题研究”（19CKPJ11）
山东省高等学校人文社科计划一般项目“社会型创新背景下两元创新激励机制研究”（J17RA018）
关键词
控制人机构设立地法“
目标/指向”规则
数据主体惯常居所地法
强行性法规
law of the country of controller’s establishment
rule of"targeting/directing"
law of data subject’ s habitual residence
overriding mandatory provisions
作者简介
肖夏,山东财经大学讲师。
