认罪认罚自愿性的法院审查难题及其破解被引量：8

Difficulties and Solution of the Court Review of Voluntary Confession and Punishment

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要认罪认罚从宽制度的推行让自愿性审查成为诉讼制度发展的焦点之一,然而,在当前制度语境下,进行自愿性审查面临着证据规则的结构缺失、主流观点的认识偏差、主观意愿的客观评价困难等难题。当前学界形成了以“防范冤假错案的底线控制”为判断标准,以“律师介入权”“后果知情权”“意愿撤回权”“自愿事实被审理权”等四项权利为供给侧保障的改革思路,即“一线四权”的自愿性保障体系,但这未能达到保障被追诉人自愿性的要求。对此,应着力建构“内外融贯性”标准系统,即将内部性标准与外部性标准进行勾连。内部性标准包括概括认罪的基本忠诚度标准、认罪事实的经验协调性标准,外部性标准包括程序分流的路径盖然性标准、诉讼全程的程序合规性标准。在此基础上,建立对被追诉人的庭前单独答辩程序、否定自愿性认罪的一断终局机制、否定自愿性认罪的程序即转机制作为制度保障。 The implementation of the lenient admission of guilt and punishment has made the voluntary review one of the focuses in the development of the litigation system.However,in the current institutional context,voluntary review is faced with difficulties such as the lack of structure of the rules of evidence,the cognitive bias of mainstream views,and the difficulty of objective evaluation of subjective will.The current academic circles have formed a bottom line control preventing unjust,false and erroneous cases as the judgment standard,and they take the four rights,namely the right to an attorney,the right to know the consequences,the right to withdraw the intention and the right to trial,as a reform thinking for supply side guarantee.However,the“one standard four rights”voluntary security system fails to meet the requirement of guaranteeing the voluntary nature of the prosecuted.In this regard,we should construct the standard system of“internal and external coherence”to link up the internal criterion and the external criterion.The internal criterion includes the basic loyalty standard that generalizes confession and the empirical coordination standard of confession fact and the external criterion includes the standard of procedural probability of procedural diversion and the standard of procedural compliance in the whole process of lawsuit.On this basis,a separate pre-trial defense procedure for the accused,an end-to-end mechanism to deny voluntary confession,and an immediate transfer mechanism to deny voluntary confession are established as system guarantees.

作者韩晗 HAN Han(Law School,Shandong University,Qingdao 266237,China)

机构地区山东大学法学院

出处《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期37-51,共15页 Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基金国家社科基金项目“基于犯罪嫌疑人权利保障的监察委员会调查权研究”(17BFX055)

关键词认罪认罚自愿性标准保障 admission of guilt and punishment voluntary standard security

分类号 D925.2 [政治法律—诉讼法学]

作者简介韩晗(1992-),男,山东潍坊人,山东大学法学院博士研究生,主要研究方向为刑事诉讼法、监察法、司法制度。