摘要
关于如何应对被追诉人上诉的问题一直颇有争议,在严格保障被追诉人上诉权的要求下,检察机关探索出以抗诉应对上诉的路径。对452份裁判文书的实证研究表明,这种抗诉应对法存在着效果未达预期、各司法机关观点不同等诸多问题,也存在与刑事司法制度价值取向、刑事诉讼原则、现行规范的冲突。进一步完善认罪认罚从宽制度,避免检察机关抗诉权的异化,加强对被追诉人上诉的自愿性、真实性保障机制的建设很有必要。
The issue of how to deal with the appeal of the accused has been quite controversial.Under the requirement of strictly protecting the appeal right of the accused,the prosecutorial agency has explored the path of counterappeal to deal with the appeal.The empirical study of 452 judgment documents shows that this counterappeal response law has many problems,such as the effect is not up to expectations,different views of various judicial agencies,and there are conflicts with the value orientation of criminal justice system,criminal procedure principles,and current norms in theory.It is necessary to further improve the leniency system of confessing crime and admitting punishment,avoid the alienation of the prosecutorial agency's right of appeal,and strengthen the construction of the voluntary and authentic guarantee mechanism for the appeal of the accused.
作者
林泽宇
LIN Ze-yu(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620)
出处
《司法警官职业教育研究》
2023年第4期41-49,共9页
Vocational Education Research of Judicial Police
关键词
认罪认罚
抗诉
上诉权
Confessing Crime and Admitting Punishment
Counterappeals
Appeal Right
作者简介
林泽宇(1998-),男,福建福州人,华东政法大学刑事法学院22级刑事诉讼法学硕士,研究方向:刑事诉讼法学、检察学。
