摘要
监察程序与司法程序的证据衔接是监察体制改革中需解决的重要问题。现行《监察法》通过三个条文对证据衔接机制加以规定。从规范层面加以梳理,现行衔接机制存在着证据收集的标准鸿沟、证据移送的性质混同、证据审查的制度真空等问题。由于衔接机制尚存缺陷,司法程序面临着极大的证据隐患,即标准鸿沟下的异化倾向、性质混同下的证据隐忧以及制度真空下的制约不足。基于此,程序间的证据转化需要构建统一的衔接机制,并从证据收集、证据移送与证据审查三个角度入手加以完善。
The convergence of evidence in the supervision and the judicial proceedings is an important issue to be solved.The current“Supervision Law”adopts three provisions to specify the linking mechanism of evidence.To sort through the normative level,the current convergence mechanism has problems such as the standard gap in the collection of evidence,the mixed nature of the evidence transfer,and the institutional dilemma in evidence review.Due to the flaws in the linking mechanism,judicial proceedings face great hidden dangers of evidence,namely,the tendency of alienation under the standard,the problems under the mixed nature and the lack of restriction.Based on this,the transformation of evidence between procedures needs to build a unified convergence mechanism,and reform from the three perspectives of evidence collection,evidence transfer and evidence review.
作者
王瑞剑
WANG Rui-jian(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《北京警察学院学报》
2018年第4期19-24,共6页
Journal of Beijing Police College
基金
国家社科基金项目<贪污贿赂犯罪量刑规范化研究>(项目编号:16BFX078)
关键词
监察程序
司法程序
证据衔接
supervision procedure
criminal procedure
the convergence of evidence
作者简介
王瑞剑(1994—),男,北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院研究生。
