摘要
2014年修改后的《行政诉讼法》将行政机关不依法履行、未按照约定履行或者违法变更、解除政府特许经营协议、土地房屋征收补偿协议等内容纳入受案范围。基于保障公共服务连续性、维护行政秩序以及国家承担担保责任的需要,确立行政协议中行政优益权有其必要性。然而,纵观当前的司法审查实践,行政机关行使优益权时在一定程度上忽视程序性审查,且法定解除权与行政优益权的关系尚未理顺,行政优益权行使后补救措施不力。固此,应当从重构司法审查标准、优化司法审查方式、落实补救措施等方面完善司法审查规则。
The Administrative Procedural Law amended in 2014 expand the scope of the case, including government franchise agreement and the land housing compensation agreement. Based on the guarantee of public service continuity, the maintenance of administrative order and the assumption of state guarantee responsibilities, the exercise of administrative superiority in administrative agreements is necessary. However, looking at the current judicial review practice, we are faced with a high degree of respect for the exercise of administrative superiority, ignoring the procedural review, the confusion of the statutory right of cancellation and judgment of administrative superiority and the unclear remedy after the exercise of administrative superiority. In this regard, the judicial review rules should be improved in terms of reconstructing judicial review standards, optimizing review methods and implementing remedial measures.
作者
张鲁萍
ZHANG Lu-ping(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Law School of Administration Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《西南政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2018年第5期3-12,共10页
Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
西南政法大学2014年校级科研项目"公共服务外包的政府规制研究"(2014XZQN-32)
关键词
行政协议
行政优益权
司法审查
administrative agreement
administrative superiority
judicial review
作者简介
张鲁萍（1987），女，江苏镇江人，西南政法大学行政法学院讲师，中央党校（国家行政学院）博士后研究人员，法学博士。
