摘要
自2014年修改的《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》将行政协议纳入行政诉讼的受案范围之后,有关行政协议识别问题的争议便未曾停歇。“永佳纸业公司案”作为直接关涉“行政协议定义”的参考案例,为行政协议的诉讼识别提供了借鉴思路,一经完善便可从中抽象出一套模式化的识别路径。行政协议的诉讼识别应当综合考虑主体、内容、目的和意思四个要素,首先以主体要素为前置性条件进行形式审查,然后以内容要素——“行政法上的权利义务”为核心,辅之以目的要素、行政优益权以及比例原则进行实质审查,从而构建出综合四个要素、先形式审查后实质审查的模式化识别路径。
Since the Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China amended in 2014,administrative agreement has been included into the scope of accepting cases of administrative litigation,and the dispute on the identification of administrative agreement has not stopped.“YongJia Paper Company Case”,as a reference case directly related to“definition of administrative agreement”,provides reference ideas for the litigation identification of administrative agreement.Once perfected,a set of patterned identification path can be abstracted from it.Action recognition of administrative agreement should be considered the main body,content,purpose and meaning of four elements,in the first place in the form of principal elements for fundamental condition for review,and then around the content elements-“administrative law on the rights and obligations”as the core,supplemented by objective factors and prior right,administrative proportion principle to carry on the examination as to substance,so as to build a comprehensive form of four elements,first review after examination as to substance of pattern recognition path.
出处
《贸大法律评论》
2020年第1期183-193,共11页
Uibe Legal Science
关键词
行政协议
诉讼识别
四个要素
两条标准
行政法上的权利义务
administrative agreement
identification of litigation
four elements
two criteria
rights and obligations under administrative law
作者简介
周远洋,中央财经大学法学院硕士研究生。
