摘要
传统的属地管辖原则在网络空间失灵。实害或者影响关联性标准是解决刑法的网络空间效力问题的方案之一。但是,该标准具有形式较模糊、内容不确定、借鉴不充分、根据不明确等缺陷。与此标准相关,我国刑法亦无法原封不动地移植最低联系标准、最密切联系原则以及领土具体化说、社会关系重心说、效果原则、普遍原则等。我国的网络主权是一项事实性和领土性的物理权力。基于该网络主权观,结果及与行为的关联度模型可能是对我国管辖规定的最优解释。根据此模型,实害结果及其与行为的关系越直接、集中的法院地法院管辖地位越高;危险结果及其与行为的关系越间接、松散的法院地法院管辖地位越低。无论如何,刑法的网络空间效力的标准设定应遵循国际法主权原则、刑法体系性原则、程序正当性原则、司法技术性原则、国际法标准原则等五项原则。
The standard related to traditional territorial jurisdiction principle is failing in cyberspace. The damage or influence is one of the solutions to the cyberspace effectiveness of criminal law. However, the standard has a more vague form but does not have enough reference. And its contents are easy to swing and its foundation is not clear. In line with this standard, the minimum contact standard, the most significant relationship principle, the specific territory doctrine, the focus of social relations, the effects doctrine and the universal cyberspace jurisdiction are not able to be transplanted to China＇s criminal law. China＇s cyberspace sovereignty is a physical and territorial power. According to this sovereignty theory, the model of the results and correlations between results and behaviors may be the optimal interpretation of the provisions of our jurisdiction. According to this model, the more continuous and systematic the relationship between damages and behaviors is, the higher the jurisdictional status is. On the contrary, the less continuous and systematic the relationship between damages and behaviors is, the lower the jurisdictional status is. Anyway, the jurisdiction of criminal law should follow the principles of the sovereignty doctrine of international law, the system of criminal law, the due process doctrine, the judicial technologies, and the international standards.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期89-109,共21页
China Legal Science
基金
国家社科基金重大招标项目"大数据和审判体系与审判能力现代化研究"(项目批准号:17ZDA131)
教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"刑法出罪机制问题研究"(项目批准号:15YJA820015)的阶段性研究成果
作者简介
东南大学法学院教授，博士生导师。
