期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹手术治疗胆结石的临床效果 被引量:12

Clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of gallstone
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹手术对胆结石的临床效果。方法选取2016年1月~2017年7月于我院治疗胆结石的74例患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方法将患者分成采用常规开腹手术治疗的对照组(37例)与采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗的观察组(37例),对两组患者的手术治疗时间、手术出血量、住院天数、术后排气时间以及术后并发症等相关情况进行观察并比较。结果采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗的观察组手术治疗时间为(55.9±4.1)min,术中出血量为(44.2±9.3)m L,住院天数为(5.4±1.2)d,术后排气时间为(10.9±2.6)h。对照组手术治疗时间为(74.1±3.9)min,术中出血量为(61.8±8.6)m L,住院天数为(8.1±2.4)d,术后排气时间为(24.7±3.6)h。观察组上述指标均显著优于对照组(P均<0.05),此外观察组术后并发症发生率为13.51%,显著低于对照组的27.73%(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术与常规开腹手术相比,能够在保证胆结石患者治疗效果的基础上,缩短治疗时间,减少对患者的创伤,加速恢复时间,减少术后并发症,安全有效,值得推广。 Objective To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparotomy on gallstone. Methods A total of 74 patients with gallstones treated in our hospital from January 2016 to July 2017 were selected and divided into the control group(n=37) undergoing conventional laparotomy and the observation group(n=37) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The surgical treatment time, the amount of operation bleeding, hospitalization days, postoperative exhaust time and postoperative complications were observed and compared. Results The surgical treatment time of the observation group treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy was(55.9±4.1) min, the blood loss was (44.2±9.3) mL, the length of hospital stay was (5.4±1.2) days, and the postoperative exhaust time was (10.9±2.6) h. The operation time of the control group was(74.1±3.9) min, the intraoperative blood loss was(61.8±8.6) mL, the length of hospitalization was (8.1±2.4) days and the postoperative exhaust time was (24.7±3.6) h. The above indexes in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group(all P〈0.05). In addition, the postoperative complication rate in the observation group was 13.51%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group(27.73%, P〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional laparotomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can shorten the treatment time, reduce the trauma to patients, accelerate the recovery time, reduce the postoperative complications, and is safe and effective on the basis of ensuring the therapeutic effect of gallstone patients, which is worthy of promotion.
作者 柳利
出处 《中国现代医生》 2018年第1期43-45,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 腹腔镜手术 开腹手术 胆结石 胆囊切除 并发症 Laparoscopic surgery Open operation Gallstones Gallbladder excision Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献125

  • 1马玉霞,韩琳,张菊霞.胆结石患者不同时间段护理工作量的研究[J].西北民族大学学报(自然科学版),2013,34(1):78-81. 被引量:9
  • 2钟扬,陈建宇,秦龙.为高龄胆结石患者行开腹手术及腹腔镜手术的疗效评价[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(10):159-160. 被引量:15
  • 3张俊杰,秦长江.腹腔镜胆囊、阑尾联合切除术126例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2004,4(5):424-424. 被引量:28
  • 4王鹤秋,于恩彦,陈虹,任志斌.合用氯米帕明对精神分裂症患者生存质量的影响[J].浙江医学,2005,27(4):253-255. 被引量:5
  • 5王秋生,张阳德.内镜腹腔镜外科学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2010:51-258.
  • 6张启瑜,钱礼.腹部外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.
  • 7李发明.胆结石患者围手术期行中西医结合护理体会[J].中闰医药指南,2013,12(6):306-307.
  • 8Ge Changqing, Li Quanfu, Liu Jianhui, et al. Compari- son of laparoscopic assisted choledochoscopy mini-chole- cystolithotomy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of 125 cases of clinical data of research[J]. China Journal of endoscopy (clinical studies)[J].2012,18(2) : 199-202.
  • 9Zhang Yangde, Joe iron, Feng Yuyang, et al. Endo- scopic minimally invasive surgery is the best way to cure the disease and retention of organs and organ function of gallbladder stone or endoscopic polypectomy[J]. China Jour- nal of endoscopy (clinical studies ) [J]. 2011,14(5) :449- 453.
  • 10郭玉香.论肝胆结石患者71例手术治疗临床效果观察.中国卫生产业志,2013,10(16):148-150.

共引文献387

同被引文献105

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部