摘要
目的将组合评价法应用于医院科技影响力评价之中,为今后相关评价工作的开展提供方法学依据。方法以42家上海市三级医院作为实证样本,运用层次分析法、主成分分析法和熵权法对其科技影响力进行综合评价,通过Kendall非参数检验对3种单一评价结果进行事前检验,在保证各方法评价结果具有一致性的前提下,采用4种组合评价方法(平均值法、Borda法、Copeland法、模糊Borda法)对单一评价方法的结果进行组合,并采用Spearman相关系数进行事后检验。结果事前检验得出上海市三级医院科技影响力的3种单一评价结果具有一致性。4种组合评价方法对3种单一综合评价结果进行组合后,事后检验发现每种组合评价的结果与原始单一评价的结果均有较强的一致性,其中以平均值组合法效果最好。结论证实了组合评价方法在医院科技影响力评价中的适用性,可用于以后我国医院科技影响力的评价实践中。
Objective To apply the combination evaluation model in the comprehensive evaluation of sci-tech influence of hospitals in China. Method 42 Grade-Ill hospitals were selected and evaluated by analytic hierarchy process （AHP）, principal components analysis and entropy method. Kendall＇s coefficient of concordance （W） was applied to check the coherence of the evaluation results from the three methods above. Average method, Borda method, Copeland method and fuzzy Borda method were used for combining the single evaluation result. Spearman rank correlation was then used for testing whether the combination evaluation results matched the single evaluation result. Result Kendalt＇s W correla- tion test showed consistency among three single evaluation results. A strong correlation between each combination evaluation result and the single evaluation result was observed by Spearman rank correlation analysis. The average method was chosen as the best method based on the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Conclusion The study confirmed that the combination evaluation method can be applied in evaluating sci-tech influence of hospitals in China.
出处
《中国医院管理》
北大核心
2017年第4期28-31,共4页
Chinese Hospital Management
基金
基金项目:中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费(2016ZX330023
2016RC330003)
关键词
组合评价
综合评价
一致性检验
科技影响力
医院
combination evaluation, comprehensive evaluation, consistency test, scientific and technological influence, hospital
作者简介
通信作者：安新颖；E—mail：an．xinying@imicams．ac．cn
