摘要
知识产权技术案件中技术事实的查明是案件审理中的焦点、难点。为攻克技术事实查明难题,司法实践中不断探索解决路径。从优化合议庭的组成到借助技术调查官的专业知识实现合议庭整体知识结构的再设计,从传统依靠鉴定到引入专家辅助人实现技术问题庭审实质化,北京知识产权法院在司法实践中逐渐建立起多元化技术事实查明机制。本文结合司法实践和审判经验,通过解构多元化技术事实查明机制及运行模式,揭示法官审理技术事实的思维导图,为进一步优化技术事实查明机制提供思路。
Technical facts investigation is both the crux in hearing IP cases concerning complicated technologies. Judicial practices never cease to explore new ways to tackle this problem. From optimizing the constitution of the collegial panel to seeking professional help from technology investigation officers, the collegial panel＇s knowledge structure is upgraded holistically. And from totally reliance on judicial appraisal to substantiation of court hearing of technical problems by expert assistants, Beijing IP Court has gradually established a diversified facts investigation mechanism in judicial practices. Based on judicial practices and trial experiences, this paper tries to deconstruct the diversified facts investigation mechanism and the operation modes thereof, revealing the judges＇ mindset in trialing technical facts, so as to provide more ideas on ftuther optimization of technical facts investigation mechanism.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第12期32-37,57,共7页
Intellectual Property
关键词
技术调查官
专家辅助人
鉴定
technology investigation officer
expert assistant
appraisal
作者简介
张玲玲,中国应用法学研究所与中国社会学院联合培养博士后,北京知识产权法院法官
