摘要
近年来,最高人民法院出台了关于仲裁司法审查的司法解释,以此为依据,通过规范分析的方法,梳理这一制度的发展背景、演进过程、机理变化和存在缺陷。最高人民法院的最新司法解释从制度原则、受理规则、审查标准和裁定效力等多方面做了改进,并逐步与《纽约公约》和《仲裁法》等国际条约和国内立法接轨。但是,仲裁司法审查制度仍存在"内外有别"、"报核制度性质不明"及"有悖诉讼法原理"等缺憾。在详细分析最新规范的优劣之处后,应用法释义学方法,针对尚存的理论盲阈逐一分析,以期在未来司法实践中为仲裁司法审查制度的运行提供理论支撑。
The Supreme People’s Court issued a number of judicial opinions at the end of 2017 in order to improve the existing judicial review system for arbitration. Based on these judicial opinions,this article mainly looks into the historic development,evolutionary process,institutional changes and inherent defects of the judicial review system for arbitration. Apparently,the new judicial opinions improve institutional rules,operational norms,review standards and legal effectiveness of the judicial review system for arbitration. As a result,the judicial review system for arbitration is in line with the New York Convention and PRC Arbitration Law. Nevertheless,the judicial review system for arbitration still has some defects. For instance,there are discrepancies when the court conducts judicial review over domestic and foreign-related arbitral awards. After reviewing the improvements and backwards of the judicial opinions,the article in the end also looks into some unresolved issues in relation to the judicial review system for arbitration. These issues are important in making the judicial review system for arbitration work well in judicial practices.
作者
沈伟
SHEN Wei(Law School,Shandong University,Qingdao Shandong 266237,China)
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期114-129,共16页
Legal Forum
关键词
仲裁
司法审查制度
司法解释
规范分析
arbitration
judicial review system
judicial opinions
normative review
作者简介
沈伟(1972-),男,江苏启东人,法学博士,山东大学法学院教授、博士生导师,主要研究方向:经济法,金融法。
