摘要
联合国贸易法委员会制定的《新加坡调解公约》,为国际商事调解协议的跨境执行提供了法律框架。批准《新加坡调解公约》将对国内商事调解的发展产生积极意义,但同时也将对国内商事调解法律制度带来冲击和挑战。目前中国在商事调解专门法律、调解协议执行机制、个人调解运行机制及商事调解员资质认定等方面仍然缺乏具体的法律安排,国内学界为此提出了修改《人民调解法》、融入《仲裁法》修改、融入《民事强制执行法》立法以及制定统一调解法等立法方案,但这些方案均存在不同程度的局限性。相较而言,先"行政法规"再"一般法律"的商事调解立法策略不仅契合当前国内的立法实际,而且能够更为顺利的实现与《新加坡调解公约》的对接。
The Singapore mediation convention formulated by UNCITRAL provides a legal framework for the cross-border implementation of international commercial mediation settlement agreements.The ratification of Singapore mediation convention will have positive significance for the development of domestic commercial mediation,but it will also bring impact and challenge to the domestic legal system of commercial mediation.At present,China still lacks specific legal arrangements in terms of special laws on commercial mediation,implementation mechanism of settlement mediation agreement,operation mechanism of individual mediation and qualification identification of commercial mediators.For this reason,the domestic academic circles have put forward some legislative proposals,such as amending the people’s mediation law,integrating the amendment of the arbitration law,integrating the legislation of the civil enforcement law,and formulating the unified mediation law,but these schemes have different degrees of limitations.Comparatively speaking,the legislative strategy of"administrative regulations"followed by"general laws"not only conforms to the current domestic legislative practice,moreover,it can realize the docking with Singapore mediation convention more smoothly.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2021年第2期17-30,共14页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
中国博士后基金面上资助项目“国际商事和解协议在中国法院的审查与执行研究”(项目编号:2020M670561)
湖南省教育厅项目“《新加坡调解公约》下我国商事调解制度的困境与应对”(项目编号:19K092)的阶段性成果
关键词
新加坡调解公约
商事调解
跨境执行
立法选择
Singapore Mediation Convention
commercial mediation
cross-border enforcement
legislative choice
作者简介
段明,中国人民大学法学院博士后、讲师,最高人民法院第五批法律研修学者。
