摘要
对仲裁实施司法监督是仲裁制度正常运转的重要保障,自1995年《仲裁法》实施以来,我国通过引入对仲裁裁决的不予执行制度和双轨制的撤销裁决制度初步建立起了我国的仲裁司法监督体系。但随着时代和社会的逐渐发展,部分在特定历史背景下诞生的司法监督制度难以与新时代的仲裁实践相匹配,并在实践中导致了制度功能冲突和仲裁独立性丧失等问题。在推进法治中国建设的进程中,对仲裁制度的质量要求也势必会逐渐提高。为此,本文在考察我国现行主要的仲裁司法监督制度的诞生和适用的特定历史背景的同时,结合此次《仲裁法》的修订,主张取消国内仲裁的不予执行制度,并完善相应的配套制度,通过引入第三人撤销仲裁裁决之诉以及对法院审查范围的进一步限缩,为我国仲裁司法监督制度的完善提供路径参考。
Judicial review of arbitration is an important guarantee for the normal operation of arbitration system.Since the implementation of the Arbitration Law in 1995,China has initially established a judicial supervision system for arbitration in China by providing for the non-enforcement of arbitral awards and a two-track system of setting aside arbitral awards.However,with the gradual development of the times and society,many judicial supervision systems born and operated in a specific historical context have lost their necessity and rational basis of existence,and have led to the problems of conflicting institutional functions and loss of arbitration independence in judicial practice.In the process of promoting the establishment of China’s rule of law,the demands on the arbitration system are bound to increase gradually.In this regard,while examining the historical background of the birth and application of China’s existing judicial supervision system,and taking into account the current situation of arbitration in China and international trends,this paper combines the revision of the Arbitration Law,advocates the cancellation of the non-enforcement system in domestic arbitration,and improves the corresponding supporting system,through the introduction of the third party right to set aside the arbitral award and the further restriction of court review to provide a path reference for the improvement of Chinese judicial supervision system.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2023年第5期81-93,共13页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
仲裁司法监督
不予执行
撤销裁决
双轨制
judicial supervision of arbitration
non-enforcement
setting aside of awards
dual-track governance
作者简介
熊海量,中国香港大学法律学院法学(仲裁与争端解决)硕士研究生。
