论国际投资仲裁中投资者利益与公共利益的平衡被引量：21

On the Equity of Public Interests and Investors' Interests in the International Investment Arbitration

导出

摘要晚近,在与公共利益有关的国际投资仲裁中出现了片面保护投资者财产利益而严重忽视东道国公共利益的倾向。可以通过在投资条约中规定一定的公共利益保护内容并建立权威的条约解释机制、在仲裁中引入国家自由裁量权理论、"兼采效果和性质标准"认定东道国措施是否构成间接征收以及增加仲裁程序透明度等措施,实现保护投资者财产利益与维护东道国公共利益在国际投资仲裁中的适当平衡。 Recently,there was a tendency in international investment arbitrations that the tribunal,when arbitrating cases involving host state＇s public interest,partially protected investor＇s interest and seriously neglected host state＇s public interest.The way to solve the situation lies in stipulating some provisions of public interest in investment treaties,introduction of the national margin of appreciation doctrine into arbitration,considering the host state＇s real purpose or motive of regulating measures and increasing the transparency of arbitration procedure so as to realize an appropriate balance of protection between investor＇s property interest and host state＇s public interest in international investment.

作者张光

机构地区中南财经政法大学法学院

出处《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期109-114,共6页 Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基金国家社科基金项目<国际投资法制中的公共利益保护问题研究>(09XFX033) 西北政法大学校级科研项目<跨国投资的环境法规制问题研究>(09XJC011)的阶段性成果

关键词国际投资仲裁公共利益利益平衡 international investment arbitration public interest the equity of interests

分类号 DF964 [政治法律—国际法学]

作者简介张光（1975-），男，汉族，陕西礼泉人，西北政法大学国际法学院讲师，中南财经政法大学法学院国际法专业博士生，研究方向：国际公法、国际投资法。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1刘笋.国际投资仲裁引发的若干危机及应对之策述评[J].法学研究,2008,30(6):141-154. 被引量：55
2Santa Elena v. Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, Metalclad v. Mexican , ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 , Azurix v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, para. 148.
3Stuart G. Gross, Note, Inordinate Chill: BITs, Non - NAFTA MITs, and Host - State Regulatory Freedom - An Indonesian Case Study, 24 MICH. J. INT' L L.
4Etlvyl V. Canada [ EB/OL]. http: //www. dfait -maeci. go. ca/disp/ethyl_archive, asp, Dec. 10, 2009.
5Susan D. Franck, The Liability of International Arbitrators : A Comparative Analysis and Proposal for Qualified Immunity, 20 N.Y. L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L. ,2000.
6Zachary M. Eastman, NAFTA' s Chapter 11 : For Whose Benefit? Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 16, 1999.
7ICSID, Possible Improvements of the Framework for ICSID Arbitration, para. 4 and its Annex, ( 2006 - 1 - 10 ) [ EB/OL http: !/www. worldbank, org/icsid/highlights/DiscussionPaper, pdf.
8刘笋.论国际投资仲裁对国家主权的挑战--兼评美国的应对之策及其启示[J].法商研究,2008,25(3):3-13. 被引量：40
9Howard Mann, International Investment Agreements, Business and Human Rights: Key Issues and Opportunities, IISD Publications Centre , 2008.
10Craig Forcese, Does the Sky Fall.'? NAFTA Chapter 11 Dispute Settlement and Democratic Accountability, 14 Mich. St. J. Int 1 L. , 2006.

二级参考文献87

1余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量：40
2刘笋.国际投资与环境保护的法律冲突与协调——以晚近区域性投资条约及相关案例为研究对象[J].现代法学,2006,28(6):34-44. 被引量：25
3Samrat Ganguly, The In-vestor-- State Dispute Mechanism (ISDM) and A Sovereign ' s Power to Protect Public Health, 38 Colum. J. Transnat 'I. L. 116(1999).
4J. C. Thomas, Investor--State Arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11, 37 Canadian Year Book of Int'l Law (1999).
5Jose E. Alvarez,Critical Theory and the North American Free Trade Agreement's Chapter Eleven, 28 U. Miami Inter--Am. L. Rev. 303, 307 (1997).
6Samrat Ganguly, The In-vestor-- State Dispute Mechanism (ISDM) and A Sovereign ' s Power to Protect Public Health, 38 Colum. J. Transnat 'I. L. 119(1999).
7David A. Gantz, The Evolution of FTA Investment Provisions : From NAFTA to the United States --Chile Free Trade Agreement, 19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 684 (2004).
8Mondev Int'l Ltd. v. United States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/2, Award (Oct. 11, 2002); Loewen Group, Inc. v. United States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/98/3, Award (June 26, 2003) ; Azinian v. Mexico, 14 ICSID Rev. --Foreign Inv. L. J. , 1999.
9Charles H. Brower II, Investor-- State Disputes Under NAFTA : TheEmpire Strikes Back, 40 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 43--44 (2001).
10Guillermo Aguilar AIvarez & William W. Park, The New Face of Investment Arbitration : NAFTA Chapter 11, 28 The Yale Journal of Int'l L. 388 (2003).