期刊文献+

投资条约保护伞条款的实践及其基本内涵 被引量:7

Treaty Practices of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements and Its Basic Meanings
原文传递
导出
摘要 保护伞条款要求缔约东道国应该遵守其对另一缔约方投资者的投资所承担的任何义务。保护伞条款的权利主体、义务主体、义务性质和义务范围都存在着一些比较复杂的问题和争议。保护伞条款对于东道国施加了更加严格的国际法约束,对此,可以通过非政府组织参与跨国公法过程的方式予以必要平衡。 The Umbrella Clause requires the host Contracting Party to observe any obligation it may has entered into with the investment of the investors of the other Contracting Party. However, in practice, there are some complicated and intricate problems and controversies with the rights -subjects, obligations-subjects, obligations-nature and obligations-scope of the Umbrella Clause. A possible method of balancing between investor rights and human rights is enhancing transnational public participation of non-governmental organizations.
作者 王彦志
机构地区 吉林大学法学院
出处 《当代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期50-55,共6页 Contemporary Law Review
基金 吉林大学青年基金项目:非政府组织与国际经济法(2005QN02)
关键词 投资条约 保护伞条款 国家契约 投资条约仲裁 非政府组织 investment treaty umbrella clause state contract investment treaty arbitration NGOs
作者简介 王彦志(1971-),男,吉林舒兰人,吉林大学法学院讲师,博士研究生。
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Anthony C. Sinclair,The Origins of the Umbrella Clause in the International Law of Investment Protection, Arbitration International, 2004, Vol. 20, No 4.
  • 2Katia Yannaca, Small, Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2006/3, OECD, October, 2006.
  • 3Thomas W. W/fide,The "Umbrella" Clause in Investment Arbitration: A Comment on Original Intention and Recent Cases, Joum/fi of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 6, No. 2, April 2005, p. 203.
  • 4Noble Ventures, Inc. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/11,Award, 12 October 2005, at paras. 68, 84 - 86.
  • 5Impregilo S. p.A.v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/3, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 April 2005, at paras. 209 -210,216, 223,262.
  • 6James Crawford, The International Law Commission' s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 7F. A. Mann, British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, in F. A. Mann, Further Studies in International Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
  • 8SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance S. A.v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ARB/01/13, Decision of the Tribunal, August 6, 2003, at paras. 169 -172.
  • 9Eureko B.V.v. Republic of Poland, Partial Award and Dissenting Opinion, 19 August 2005, at para. 246.
  • 10SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance S. A.v. Republic of the Philippines, ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, January 29, 2004, at para. 117, 119, 121, 124, 126, 128.

同被引文献59

引证文献7

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部