期刊文献+

江汉平原农业多功能性保全的CVM研究 被引量:6

CVM Study of Preservation of Agricultural Multi-functionality in Jianghan Plain
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用条件价值评估法(CVM),采用入户调查和访谈相结合的方式,随机抽样调查了江汉平原部分县乡的870位农民,了解农民对农业多重功能的具体内涵、公益功能的保护责任等方面的认知程度,调查农民自愿参与农业多功能性保全的支付意愿,并对影响支付意愿的主要社会经济因素进行相关性分析。结果表明:在除了物质生产以外的公益功能中,受访者对防止水土流失这一公益功能的认知度最高,达67.84%,而对其它公益功能的认知度都低于50%;86.84%的受访者愿意为农业多功能的保全支付额外的费用,剩余的13.16%则因责任归属不明或时间金钱匮乏等而拒绝支付;对影响农民支付意愿的诸多因素进行的相关分析显示,支付意愿与调查区域、性别、文化程度、收入来源呈极显著相关,与受访者年龄呈显著相关;运用Logistic回归分析得出家庭收入来源和受教育程度这2项对支付意愿的敏感性较大,而年龄和性别这2项对支付意愿的敏感性较小。 Based on the random sampling investigation of 870 peasants living in some countries in Jianghan Plain,this paper adopted the mode of questionnaires and home interviews and conformed to the principle of contingent valuation method (CVM) to investigate the peasants' cognitive level on specific connotation of Agricultural multi-functionality and responsibility to protect public welfare functions, and their willingness to pay (WTP) about the multiple functions, and simultaneity to analyze the interrelationship between respondents ' social-economic characteristics and WTP. The results show that except material production,the peasants' cognitive level on preventing soil and water erosion is the highest in all public welfare functions, reaching 67. 84 percent,while the awareness of other public functions is lower than 50 percent. 86.84 percent of interviewees are willing to pay additional costs for the preservation of Agricultural Multi-functionality, while the remaining 13. 16 percent refuses to pay due to uncertain attribution responsibility and lack of money and time. Correlation analysis reveals that the respondents survey region, sexuality, education, source of income have extremely significant correlation with WTP value, while the respondents' age has significant correlation with it. Meanwhile, logistic regression analysis reveals that source of income and educational level are more sensitive to willingness to pay than the age and sexuality.
机构地区 长江大学农学院
出处 《华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第1期32-35,共4页 Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2007BAD87B09) 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金(教外司留[2008]890号)
关键词 江汉平原 农业多功能性 环境保全 条件价值评估法(CVM) 支付意愿(WTP) Jianghan Plain agricultural multi-functionality environmental preservation contin gent valuation method (CVM) willingness to pay (WTP)
作者简介 曹鹏(1986-),男,硕士研究生;研究方向:农业生态学。E—mail:c—peng@hotmail.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献116

  • 1杜亚平.改善东湖水质的经济分析[J].生态经济,1996,12(6):15-20. 被引量:19
  • 2梅纳德MH.环境、自然系统和发展——经济评价指南[M].北京:烃加工业出版社,1988..
  • 3[11]Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K,et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 12:161-179.
  • 4[12]Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 585-612.
  • 5[13]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24: 15-29.
  • 6[14]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
  • 7[15]Jorgenson B S, Wilson M A, Heberlein T A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1): 133-148.
  • 8[17]Lovett A, Bateman I J. Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Progress and prospects [J]. Computer, Environment and Urban systems, 2001, 25: 131-139.
  • 9[18]Smith V K. Non-market valuation of environmental resources: An interpretive appraisal [J]. Land Economics, 1993, 69: 1-26.
  • 10[19]Brown T C, Gregory R. Why the WTP-WTA disparity matters [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28: 323-335.

共引文献593

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部