摘要
民事调解以自愿为核心原则,但这并不意味着调解不存在强制性内容。调解的强制性以强制调解为集中体现,既包括程序上的先行调解,也包括实体上的法官裁定调解内容。尽管我国台湾地区实行的法院附设调解模式与大陆诉讼调解模式不同,但其先行调解的规定对大陆调解模式改革具有启迪意义。应当承认调解在某些方面具有强制性因素,从分析特定纠纷的性质以及诉讼存在的不便来看,应在我国大陆调解模式中设立强制调解。
Voluntary is the core principle of civil court-conciliation. But it doesn＇t mean that there is no forcible nature in court-conciliation, which is presented by pre-conciliation composed of pre-conciliation on procedure meaning and forcible substantial decision. Although the style conciliation of Taiwan district is out-litigation court-conciliation that is different with the style of the mainland＇ s, its regulation about pre-conciliation is worthy of reference. We should admit that conciliation has some forcible nature and establish the pre-conciliation in the mainland＇ s conciliation style through analyzing the nature of some special dispute and the shortcoming of the litigation.
出处
《政法论丛》
2008年第1期77-81,共5页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
调解
自愿
强制性
强制调解
conciliation
voluntary
forcible nature
pre-conciliation
作者简介
宋明志（1980-），男，河北邢台人，中国政法大学民事诉讼法学博士研究生，研究方向为民事诉讼法学。
