摘要
2006年度,中国国际关系学取得了一定成绩,但原有的一些重大的深层缺陷并未得到明显改进。在学科队伍与研究平台等方面,已粗具规模,为学科发展奠定了良好基础;与此同时,仍存在研究力量地域分布失衡、部分期刊作者面较窄、国际学术交流“赤字”严重等问题。在研究进展方面,研究领域稳步拓展,多元化趋势明显,开始体现出中国作为一个潜在学术大国应有的广度与气度。具体的成绩与问题则是:理论研究向多维度拓展并开始探索中国理论或学派的生成,但力度与深度均嫌不够;经验研究虽紧紧抓住了服务于中国外交这个核心,但缺点是诠释有余,反思不足。在学术创新与批评方面,由于诸多因素的制约,主要表现为创新疲软、批评乏力,这正在成为影响学科发展的最大因素。为改变以上状况,必须在学科平台、科研体制、人才培养和研究议程等方面进一步加强与调整,为中国国际关系学提供一个更加厚重的基础和更加广阔的发展空间。
Although some intrinsic shortcomings still existed,the study of international relations in China made a certain progress in 2006.First,in spite of the fact that an increasing number of researchers,institutions,and publications formed a solid foundation for the study of international relations,the following problems still existed:the researchers were overly concentrated in Beijing and Shanghai,some researchers had no opportunities to publish their works,and there was a lack of intercourse with international scholars.Second,the number of research sub-fields increased and pluralism became a more obvious trend.This contributed to China becoming a great scholarly power.Last,the unresolved problems of China's IR studies include a shortage of innovation and superficial criticism.These may be the greatest obstacles to fostering future studies.Therefore,some necessary consolidations and changes should be carried out in scholarly publications,the research system,the cultivation of graduates,and the research agendas so that the study of international relations in China will have a more solid foundation and a wider space for development.
出处
《世界经济与政治》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第5期68-79,共12页
World Economics and Politics
基金
中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所资助的所级课题的阶段性成果
作者简介
执笔人:谭秀英、主父笑飞、赵远良、张达、李开盛.