摘要
尽管国内犯罪学理论研究视野开阔并形成了完整的理论体系,其背靠社会学的发展也使得它在法学领域拥有相当大的影响力,但是,社会对犯罪理论的过高期待与信息资源的相对短缺,极大阻碍着犯罪学的纵深研究;三段式理论的固化和泛化研究替代严谨论证的做法,也导致问题与立论分离;经验观察替代科学实证,降低了犯罪学的学科价值。为此,犯罪学的解困在于恪守事实科学的本分,保持独立批判的眼光。
The location of utility and the relative shortness of information resources hinder the research of Criminology in depth. The solidity of syllogism and the practice that rigorous argumentation is replaced by general research lead to the separation of issues from argumentations： The scientific positive method replaced by the popular experience observation, which also reduces the subject value of Criminology. Therefore, criminology should be located in letting up a perfect scientific knowledge system, interpreting crime and forecasting trend. The resolution to these problems in criminology lies in strictly abiding by the duty of factual science and keeping an independent critical vision.
出处
《西南师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第5期82-86,共5页
Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
犯罪学
学术困境
解释犯罪
实证分析
criminology
academic dilemma
interpret crime
positive analysis
作者简介
王利荣（1957-），女，湖南衡阳人，西南政法大学法学院，教授，主要研究行刑学、刑罚学和犯罪学。
