摘要
部分请求涉及诉讼标的、既判力、诉的变更、诉讼时效的中断等众多诉讼理论,其核心问题是部分请求判决既判力的客观范围是否及于剩余债权,德、日等大陆法系国家的学者基于不同理论立场对此形成了多种学说。从“纠纷一次解决”和诉讼经济原则的角度考量,应当采纳否定说,原则上不允许当事人以分割债权的方式进行诉讼。在原告仅就部分债权提出请求时,其诉讼标的和判决既判力的范围应当及于包括剩余债权的全部债权。
A partial claim raises theoretical concerns with respect to the subject matter of a litigation, res judicata, alteration of actions or claims, and the interruption of the limitation of an action. The core issue is whether the remaining obligatory rights are subject to the res judicata of the partial claim. Based on different theories, scholars from continental countries, such as Germany, Japan, etc. set forth various doctrines. In consideration of the principle that a dispute should be solved once for all and the costliness of a suit, a negative attitude should be assumed toward partial claims. Generally the parties should not be allowed to initiate actions by the way of separating obligatory rights. Where a plaintiff lodges a partial claim, the subject matter of the action and res judicata should extend to all the remaining obligatory rights.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第1期139-144,共6页
Modern Law Science
