摘要
八股“代言”可表述为“代古人口气”和“代圣贤立言”,但二者的内涵与周延并不一致。由于时文结构的变化,“代口气”成为探讨的主要对象,使得时文游艺空间得到拓展,但隐含的失体危险引起了士子关注。出于辨体考虑,士人引入“断制”之说,以期将“代口气”和“断制”纳入到“代圣贤立言”中。处于不同身份立场的人,对“代言”探讨呈现不同的言说策略,这促成时文“代言”多维阐释空间的生成。但随着科举功令的强化,“代言”暴露出诸多弊端。对“代言”之论说,士人与官方态度多有异趣,从中颇可窥见文学与制度间施加与策应的关联。
“Endorsement”of eight-part essay mainly be expressed as“dai kou qi”and“speak on behalf of sages”,but their connotation and scope are not consistent.Due to the change of the structure of the times,“dai kou qi”had become the main object of discussion,which expanded the entertainment space of the times.However,the implied stylistic“danger”attracted the attention of scholars.Out of the consideration of distinguishing style,scholars introduced the theory of“duanzhi”to bring“dai kou qi”into“speak on behalf of sages”.People with different identities and positions presented different strategies for“endorsement”,which contributed to the generation of multi-dimensional interpretation space of“endorsement”.However,with the strengthening of orders,“endorsement”has exposed many drawbacks.The attitudes of scholars and officials were quite different,from which we can see the relationship between literature and system.
出处
《古代文学理论研究》
2022年第2期472-491,共20页
Studies of Ancient Chinese Literary Theory
基金
中国博士后科学基金第70批面上资助项目“明清文学中的‘题目’论”(项目号2021M702085)
上海市哲学社会科学规划青年项目“明中后期时文批评研究”(项目号2022EWY008)阶段性成果
关键词
八股文
代口气
“断制”
代圣立言
阐释空间
文学与制度
eight-part essay
“dai kou qi”
distinguish style
“duanzhi”
“speak on behalf of sages”
interpretive space
literature and system
