摘要
《中华人民共和国民事强制执行法(草案)》第133-135条规定了对不动产执行的强制管理措施,但对强制管理适用对象、管理人主体资格与选任条件、强制管理效力等未予充分规定,影响未来强制管理制度的适用效果。基于我国多年立法探索与实务经验,借鉴域外相关规定,应将强制管理适用范围扩张至不动产、船舶及航空器。在管理人选任上,宜限制债务人主体资格,明确任职条件,补充管理人收取报酬的权利、财务报告义务等职责配置。还需明确强制管理因债务清偿或无益管理等终结情形,确立强制管理对债务人及第三人的效力。
The draft Civil Compulsory Enforcement Law of the People’s Republic of China provides for Receivership of real estate from Article 133 to Article 135,but does not adequatelyprescribe for the objects of Receivership,the qualifications and selection conditions of the administrator,and the effectiveness of Receivership,which affects the application of enforced Receivership in the future.Based on many years of China’s legislative exploration and practical experience,and drawing on a comparative legal perspective,the scope of application of Receivership of real estate should be expanded to include real estate,ships and aircraft.In the appointment of the administrator,the qualifications of the debtor should be restricted;the conditions of appointment should be further clarified;the right of the administrator to receive remuneration should be supplemented,and the financial reporting obligations of the administrator should be supplemented,etc.In addition,it should be clarified that the Receivership is terminated due to debt settlement or unprofitable administration,etc.Establish the effectiveness of compulsory administration on debtors and third parties.
出处
《荆楚法学》
2022年第6期113-125,共13页
Jingchu Law Review
基金
2021年湖北经济学院校级青年科研基金项目“民事执行强制管理制度研究”(项目编号:XJYB202110)的阶段性成果
关键词
民事
强制执行法
强制管理
不动产
管理人
立法完善
The Draft Civil Compulsory Enforcement Law
Enforced Receivership
Real Estate
Administrator
Legislative Improvements
作者简介
邓沁婷,湖北经济学院法学院讲师。
