摘要
我国既往围绕背信罪的比较法考察多仅限于“学理知识体系的横向比对”,而对“纵向的概念谱系考略”有所忽视。就其沿革论之,背信概念源起于“基于诚实信义的契约违反”之启蒙观,而在后续流变中则经历了“权限滥用”“信义义务违背”“基于内部关系的财产照管义务违背”等思潮的碰撞及妥协。而这一妥协的产物便是,背信罪于域外的真实处罚范围除可涵摄诸如“负有照管他人财产的独立权限之人违背义务而造成损失”等典型情形外,亦可囊括部分“不法处分于经济层面应归属于他人的财产利益”之情形。这也促使后来的学者深入至义务论维度,通过对背信罪的主体施以“利他性”“内部权力地位”等约束,或依“支配”概念对背信罪的主体采二元之理解方式以求处罚范围的明晰。此等关乎背信罪之源起、流变及现状的阐述,对我国后续的背信类犯罪之立法及司法具有启发意义。
Our previous research through the medium of comparative law have been limited to the"horizontal comparison of the doctrinal knowledge system"and have neglected the"vertical theoretical genealogy and the study of the conceptual origins".Breach of trust originated from the concept of"breach of contract based on honesty and good faith",and in the subsequent evolution,it has experienced the collision and compromise of ideas such as"abuse of authority","breach of fiduciary duty"and"breach of duty of care based on internal relationship".The product of this compromise also made the crime of breach of trust include part of the"illegal disposal of property interests that should be attributed to another person at the economic level".This also prompted later scholars to go deeper into the deontological dimension by imposing constraints on the subject of the crime of breach of trust,such as"altruism"and"internal position of power"or adopting a binary understanding of the subject of the crime of breach of trust based on the concept of"domination".
出处
《荆楚法学》
2023年第6期135-148,共14页
Jingchu Law Review
关键词
背信
权限滥用
财产保护义务
Breach of Trust
Abuse of Authority
Obligation to Protect Property
作者简介
张梓弦,北京大学法学院助理教授
