摘要
中国基层纠纷调解在历史变迁过程中呈现不同的模式,以不同视角考察不同时期模式特点,展现历史变迁的整体样貌、演变情况与反思启示。传统中国纠纷调解与政治上治理体制相混合,随着纠纷解决层级上移而上移,为民间非正式调解形式留出空间,构成官方与民间互动机制,在经济上获得纠纷解决最佳效率配置,属于“官民互动”模式;近代中国的法制转型中,调解手段被法律化与制度化,弱化民间自主纠纷解决的社会基础,转化为“法制侧重”的调解模式;从革命战争时期开始,调解制度建构有其历史惯性,文化因素延续民间非正式的多元纠纷调解的转化发展,是“文化延续”模式。可见,从政治、经济、法律、社会、历史与文化多维视角,展现调解变迁的样貌、演变与延续原因等特质,并给予现代制度与适用的反思、借鉴与启示。
China's grass-roots dispute mediation has presented different modes in the process of historical changes.It examines the characteristics of the modes in different periods from different perspectives,showing the overall appearance,evolution and reflection of historical changes.The traditional Chinese dispute mediation and the political governance system are mixed,and move up with the dispute resolution level,leaving room for the informal mediation form of the people,forming an interactive mechanism between the government and the people,and obtaining the best efficiency allocation of dispute resolution economically.It belongs to the“official people interaction”mode;In the legal system transformation of modern China,the mediation means were legalized and institutionalized,weakening the social foundation of civil independent dispute resolution and transforming into a mediation mode of“focusing on the legal system”;Since the revolutionary war period,the construction of mediation system has its historical inertia.Cultural factors continue the transformation and development of folk informal multi dispute mediation,which is a“cultural continuation”mode.It can be seen that from the multi-dimensional perspective of politics,economy,law,society,history and culture,it shows the appearance of mediation changes,the reasons for evolution and continuation,and gives reflection,reference and Enlightenment to modern systems and applications.
出处
《民间法》
2022年第2期348-366,共19页
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA189)
关键词
纠纷调解
制度化
传统文化
制度变迁
dispute mediation
Institutionalization
Traditional culture
Institutional change
作者简介
杨晔,海南大学法学院理论法学专业博士研究生。
