摘要
Shaker A.Zahra是创业领域的国际著名学者,他聚焦“创新驱动创业”这一新兴构念撰写了评论性文章,阐述了其对“创新驱动创业”的内涵、意义、过程和政策等方面的思考。本文结合蔡莉等(2021)和Zahra(2023),从理论价值、现实价值、产业价值三方面探讨了创新驱动创业的时代意义,并结合中国情境,提出了创新驱动创业的政策意义,进而结合浙江大学实践分析了创新驱动创业人才的培养模式创新。
The rapid advancement of science and technolog has brought new development opportunities,especially the rapid changes in digital technolog,which has greatly compressed the time space,organizational space and industrial space between innovation and entrepreneurship.As a result,innovation and entrepreneurship have become increasingly integrated,and the concept innovation driven entrepreneurship(IDE)was proposed.However,innovation and entrepreneurship research have long been academically isolated.In recent years,more and more scholars have integrated the two originally relatively separated research fields.Cai et al.(2021)refined IDE into an independent academic construct,and proposed the characteristics and implementation process of IDE.Zahra(2023)compared the differences between IDE and traditional entrepreneurship,and discussed the development process,success factors,cycle transformation,ecosystem growth and the role of emerging economy governments in IDE.However,the important values and inherent requirements of IDE have not been fully explained.Based on Cai et al.(2021)and Zahra(2023),we first review the concepts,characteristics,mechanisms,and processes of IDE.Furthermore,we point out that IDE has great era value,which is reflected in three aspects.First,in terms of theoretical vaue,based on Schumpeter’s perspective on innovation,we believe that innovation and entrepreneurship are essentially one,and digital technolog provides more platforms and opportunities for IDE.In the digital age,individuals and organizations have established new relationships,giving rise to new forms of IDE,including granularization of basic modules,platformization of organizational structures,networking of organizational relationships,and ecologicalization of organizational situations.Second,in terms of practical value,in order to achieve breakthroughs in key core technologies and become self-reliant in science and technolog,it is of great practical value to cultivate outstanding talents and develop scientific and technological strength through IDE.Third,in terms of industrial value,digital technologies such as artificial intelligence,big data,and cloud computing have driven entrepreneurship based on digital innovation,changed the form and process of innovation,subverted the underlying logic of traditional industries,and promoted digital industrialization and industrial digitization,formed an open and shared innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem,among which the platform firm-led entrepreneurial ecosystem should attract more attention.IDE has extremely high policy significance.It provides new policy guidance for innovation and entrepreneurship in the context of self-reliant in science and technology.The first is the integration of innovation institutions and entrepreneurship institutions.It is necessary to improve relevant legislation in terms of top-level institution and establish special innovation and entrepreneurship committees and science and technology innovation funds.It is also necessary to formulate innovation and entrepreneurship institution based on the reality of uneven regional development.The second is the integration of innovation policies and entrepreneurship policies.Comprehensive consideration should be given to market policies,technological innovation policies,science and technology capital policies,fiscal and taxation policies,innovative talent policies to make the connection between innovation and entrepreneurship closer and increase the speed of mutual transformation between them.The third is the integration of innovative organizations and entrepreneurial organizations.The main role in the process of IDE should be given to enterprises,promoting innovation synergy and jointly exerting efforts at the industrial and regional levels.The fourth is the integration of innovation mechanisms and entrepreneurial mechanisms.By using motivation mechanism,process mechanism,capability mechanism and incentive mechanism rationally and comprehensively,we can better realize the integration and transformation between innovation and entrepreneurship.New education mode for IDE is the basic guarantee for achieving IDE development.It is necessary to establish education ecosystems that drive innovation and entrepreneurship,and make institutional considerations in three aspects.First,the operation of the IDE ecosystem is based on the collaboration of multiple entities including governments,universities,industrial organizations,and service agencies.Second,it is necessary to reshape the government’s innovation and entrepreneurship education policy system and promote talent cultivation for IDE through industry-education collaboration,science-education integration,and industry-university-research integration.Third,industrial organizations can provide industry knowledge and practical experience,and universities and research institutions can provide scientific research cooperation and technology transfer platforms to jointly promote the cultivation of innovative entrepreneurial talents.The contribution of this article is to summarize the meaning of IDE,elaborate on its era value and policy significance,and indicate new modes for relevant education.Future research can focus on more specific issues,such as the industrial value enhancement mechanism in the context of IDE,as well as the specific means and effects of integration of innovation policies and entrepreneurship policies.
作者
魏江
路云飞
夏敏
Jiang Wei;Yunfei Lu;Min Xia(School of Business Administration,Zhejiang University of Finance&Economics;School of Management,Zhejiang University)
出处
《管理学季刊》
2023年第4期28-37,159-160,共12页
Quarterly Journal of Management
基金
国家自然科学基金重大项目“创新驱动创业的重大理论与实践问题研究”(项目编号:72091310)中课题四“创新驱动下平台企业主导的创业生态系统研究”(项目编号:72091312)的资助。
关键词
创新驱动创业
时代价值
政策意义
人才培养
innovation driven entrepreneurship
era value
policy significance
personnel education
作者简介
魏江,博士,浙江财经大学党委副书记、副校长(主持行政工作),浙江大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,教育部长江学者特聘教授。研究方向为创新管理、战略管理,出版著作包括《非对称创新战略:中国企业的跨越(理论辑)》《数字创新》《数字战略》《企业创新生态系统》等,提出“非对称创新”“制度型市场”“数据基础观”等原创理论;路云飞,浙江大学管理学院博士研究生。研究方向为数字创新、平台战略,曾在《科学学研究》等期刊发表论文,曾获中国管理学年会优秀论文奖;夏敏,浙江大学管理学院博士研究生。研究方向为数字创新、国际化战略,曾在International Journal of Technology Management和《科研管理》等期刊发表论文,并有案例入选第十四届“全国百篇优秀管理案例”。
