摘要
有观点认为,法益概念与自由主义没有必然关联,进而指出所谓批判立法的法益概念系学者臆想之产物。然而,这一观点有待商榷。相关宪法体系、比例原则和危害原则无法取代批判立法的法益概念。批判立法的法益概念具有认识论、本体论和价值论上的正当性依据。批判立法的法益论者应放弃"硬性"制约立法者的企图,而专注发挥这一理论基于商谈的"顾问"功能,并有必要接纳积极自由的概念。
There is a view that the concept of Rechtsgut is not necessarily related to liberalism,and the legislation-criticized concept of Rechtsgut is a product of scholars’conjectures,which cannot be established.The constitutional system,the principle of proportionality,and the principle of harm cannot replace the legislation-criticized concept of Rechtsgut.The legislation-criticized concept of Rechtsgut has a legitimate basis in epistemology,ontology and axiology.The legislation-criticized concept of Rechtsgut should abandon the“hard”attempt to restrict legislators and focus on the function of“consultant”based on negotiation.It is necessary to accept a positive concept of freedom.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第5期190-205,共16页
Law and Social Development
基金
重庆市新型犯罪研究中心教师项目“竞技体育领域新型兴奋剂滥用问题研究”(21XXFZ04)
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“推进国家监察全覆盖研究”(18JZD037)的阶段性成果
关键词
批判立法的法益概念
正当性
理论定位
积极自由
Legislation-Criticized Concept of Rechtsgut
Legitimacy
Theoretical Positioning
Positive Freedom
作者简介
贾健,西南政法大学法学院副教授、博士生导师。
