摘要
认罪认罚从宽制度是全球合作式诉讼模式发展趋势下的中国范例,既植根于本土实践,又借鉴了域外相似制度的经验。目前,学界对域外相似制度的研究明显不足,有必要通过微观比较研究予以适当弥补。微观比较视野是对传统宏观比较理论解构之后的精细化运用。立足于我国认罪认罚从宽制度的基础之上,锚定合作式刑事诉讼这一特定制度,透过司法价值、诉讼结构和规则设置三个具体层面来揭示域外相似制度的深层细节。通过在多维模型的视角下提炼合作式刑事诉讼制度在不同层面的类型化特征,厘清认罪认罚从宽的制度谱系,识别具体规则所属的模式特征,同时考察域外相似制度的实践效果,反思我国认罪认罚从宽制度的优势与不足,从而有针对性地汲取域外经验。通过融合我国本土司法实践和合作式刑事诉讼制度的全球经验,为推动认罪认罚从宽制度的系统化完善奠定基础。
Giving leniency for pleading guilty and accepting punishment is a Chinese paradigm under the trend of global consensual criminal procedure.It is rooted in local practice and draws on similar systems from other countries.The current research on extraterritorial experience is clearly inadequate,and it is necessary to make up for it appropriately through micro-comparative method.The micro-comparative method is a refined application of the traditional macro-comparative theory after its deconstruction.Based on the Chinese leniency system,by anchoring the specific system of consensual criminal procedure,a comparative study is conducted specifically from three levels:judicial value,litigation structure,and rule setting.By distilling the different types and model features of specific rules from a multidimensional perspective,it helps to clarify the institutional genealogy of giving leniency for pleading guilty and accepting punishment,identify the characteristics of specific rules,and at the same time examine the practical effects of similar systems in foreign countries,show the corresponding advantages and disadvantages,and draw on extraterritorial resources in a targeted manner.Through the integration of local contexts and global experiences,it lays the foundation for the subsequent systematic improvement of the leniency system.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第3期151-169,共19页
Law and Social Development
基金
“江苏省卓越博士后计划”的阶段性成果
关键词
微观比较
认罪认罚从宽
合作式刑事诉讼
模式理论
Micro-Comparative Method
Giving Leniency for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment
Consensual Criminal Procedure
Model Theory
作者简介
马勤,苏州大学王健法学院讲师、美国加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校跨域刑事司法研究中心研究人员。
