期刊文献+

南美洲国家联盟新型投资争端解决中心方案探析及对中国的启示

The Core Solution to New Investment Disputes in the Union of South American Nations and Related Implications for China
原文传递
导出
摘要 南美洲国家联盟新型投资争端解决中心方案,是当前发展中国家对投资者-国家争端解决机制予以完善的最新实践之一。该方案对投资者-国家争端解决机制的外部组织架构和内部运行制度都进行了一定的革新,对于国际投资法制的发展具有一定的进步意义,但也留下了一定的隐患。"一带一路"倡议是新时期中国全面扩大对外开放的重要举措,反映了当今时代的特点和要求,中国在探索构建"一带一路"新型投资争端解决机制的过程之中,应当充分汲取南美洲国家联盟新型投资争端解决中心方案的经验和教训,逐步构建出具有新时代中国特色的投资争端解决方案,为国际投资法制的发展贡献出"中国智慧"。 The UNASUR’s new Investment Dispute Resolution Center program is one of the latest practice in developing countries to improve Investor-State dispute settlement mechanism.The emergence of this program is linked to the current advancement of Latin American integration and the region’s dissatisfaction with the current state of the InvestorState dispute settlement mechanism.The program has made some innovations to the external structure and internal operation system of the Investor-State dispute settlement mechanism,and has certain progressive significance for the development of the international investment legal system.However,the program also has some problems,lacking of such as supporting measures.In the process of exploring and constructing a new“Belt and Road”investment dispute settlement mechanism.China should fully draw on the experience and lessons of UNASUR’s new investment dispute settlement center program so as to build an investment dispute solution with Chinese characteristic and contribute Chinese wisdom to the development of the international investment legal system.
作者 许皓 吴效乾
出处 《商事仲裁与调解》 2021年第4期42-53,共12页 Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金 黄冈师范学院“习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想”研究专项课题(项目编号:202007603)资助成果
关键词 南美洲国家联盟 投资争端解决机制 投资者-国家争端解决 “一带一路” UNASUR investment dispute settlement mechanism investor-state dispute resolution Belt and Road
作者简介 许皓,黄冈师范学院政法学院讲师,明珠学者,华东政法大学国际法学院博士后研究人员;吴效乾,上海文盛资产管理股份有限公司法务经理。
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献66

  • 1白中红.《能源宪章条约》的争端解决机制研究[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2011,28(3):88-99. 被引量:12
  • 2高乐咏,李瑞琴.区域经济一体化对多边自由贸易体制的影响——一个简单的制度经济学解释[J].经济问题,2007(4):6-10. 被引量:4
  • 3单文华.卡尔沃主义的“死亡”与“再生”-晚近拉美国家对国际投资立法的态度转变及其对我国的启示[J].国际经济法学刊,2006,13(1):183.
  • 4] Wenhua Shan. From North - South Divide to Private - Public Debate : Revival of the Calvo Doctrine and the Chan- ging Landscape in International Investment Law [ J ]. North- western Journal of International Law & Business ,2006 -2007, 27(3) :631 -664.
  • 5Bernardo M. Cremades. Resurgence of the Calvo Doctrine in Latin America [ J ]. Business Law International, 2006, (7):53 -72.
  • 6Donald Shea. The Calvo Clause : A Problem of Inter -American and International Law and Diplomacy [ M ]. Uni- versity of Minnesota Press, 1955 : 19 - 20.
  • 7Roger C. Wesley. The Procedural Malaise of Foreign Investment Disputes in Latin America: From Local Tribunals to Fact Finding[ J]. Law and Policy in International Business, 1975, (7) :818.
  • 8Pedro Roffe. Cairo y su Vigencia en Am6rica Latina [ M ]. Revista del Derecho Industrial, 1984 : 356 - 357.
  • 9Kenneth J. Vandevelde. Sustainable Liberalism and the International Investment Regime [ J 1. Michigan Journal of International Law, 1998, ( 19 ) :379.
  • 10JD Mortenson. The Meaning of "Investment" : IC- SID' s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law [ J ]. Harvard International Law Journal, 2010, ( 15 ) : 313.

共引文献185

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部