摘要
仲裁司法审查制度不仅涉及到当事人权利救济与司法监督仲裁,同时承担着维护仲裁公信力、提升仲裁吸引力的重要职能。然而,一直以来,我国“重刑轻民、重实体轻程序”的传统严重制约该制度发展,立法阙如导致司法适用不清。本文对88份仲裁司法审查的民事裁定书进行分析,对比发现审查法院存在审查范围交叉、相关事由认定标准模糊、程序性事项滥用、类案认定标准不一致等问题,不仅动摇仲裁制度在社会多元化治理中的地位,甚至危及仲裁的公信力。笔者认为,应当废除法院审查仲裁协议的优先权,取消仲裁裁决不予执行制度,健全仲裁裁决撤销制度,完善仲裁司法审查的救济,建立仲裁员责任制度,以统一仲裁司法审查的适用标准,保证审查过程的公正透明。
The judicial examination system of arbitration is concerned with the protection of the rights and credibility of the parties and also plays an important role in judicial supervision and arbitration.The lack of legislation jeopardizes the credibility of the arbitration system,but also the credibility of the arbitration system.The lack of legislation not only jeopardizes the credibility of the arbitration system but also the credibility of the arbitration system.This paper analyzes 88 civil adjudications of arbitration judicial examination,In contrast,the author found that there were problems such as confusion in the scope of examination,ambiguous criteria for determining related reasons,it not only shakes the position of arbitration system in social pluralistic governance,but also endangers the credibility of arbitration.As far as I am concerned,the arbitrator’s liability system should be established to avoid misjudgment and to improve the relief ways of arbitration parties,delete the system of non-execution of arbitration awards and improve it on the basis of the system of revocation of arbitration awards.The review court adheres to the principle of limited review,clarifies the review standards and scope to unify the applicable standards of arbitration judicial review,and ensures fairness and transparency in the review process.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2022年第5期104-121,共18页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
仲裁司法审查
不予执行
仲裁协议
撤销仲裁裁决
arbitration judicial review
non-execution
arbitration agreement
rescission of arbitration award
civil adjudication
作者简介
赵孟晓,湘潭大学硕士研究生。
