摘要
目前与国际商事仲裁相关的立法与实践尚未形成关于仲裁协议法律适用的统一方法,而由各国法院自行决定适用法律。在确定涉外仲裁协议准据法时,应首先考虑双方当事人就仲裁协议准据法达成的明示及默示合意,其默示合意往往是主合同准据法的扩张适用。如果不存在当事人合意,则应结合最密切联系原则认定仲裁协议准据法。实践中,仲裁地通常被认为与仲裁协议具有最密切联系。仲裁协议准据法不应局限于仲裁程序法,在判断仲裁协议有效性时应适用实体法作为补充。
Based on the consensual nature of international commercial arbitration,the tribunal’s jurisdiction derives solely from a valid arbitration agreement.However,the legislation and practice relating to international commercial arbitration have not yet reached a unified approach on determining the applicable law of arbitration agreement,leaving this problem to the discretion of tribunals and national courts.When concerning the applicable law of arbitration agreements,parties’intention should first be examined,without which the closest-connection principle that usually leads to the application of the law of the seat would be taken into account.The governing law of the arbitration agreements should not be limited to procedural rules.Substantive laws should also be considered.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2022年第6期70-80,共11页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
仲裁协议
法律适用
当事人意思自治
国际商事仲裁
arbitration agreement
governing law
party autonomy
international commercial arbitration
作者简介
郭潇晗,华东政法大学国际法学院法学硕士、新加坡国立大学法学硕士。
