摘要
物权请求权的独立性来源于物债二分体系,我国《民法典》采纳了该体系,并在物权保护中确立了独立的物权请求权制度,此种模式有利于维护权利人对物的圆满支配状态。物权请求权是在有体物保护基础上所产生的物权保护制度,其行使能够保障权利人对特定物的支配。物权请求权以物权的支配效力为基础,但其不等同于物权支配效力本身。物权请求权与债权请求权虽然存在共性,但也存在区别。在合同被宣告无效、被撤销等情形下,准确区分物权请求权与债权请求权对于理解和把握物权请求权的作用具有重要意义。物权请求权也不同于侵权损害赔偿请求权,《民法典》侵权责任编以损害赔偿为核心,构建了完善的侵权责任体系,物权请求权与侵权损害赔偿请求权的有效配合,共同形成了对物权的有效保护。
The independence of the right to real rights claims derives from the system of separating real rights and debt.China’s Civil Code adopts the system of separating real rights and debt,thus establishing an independent system for the protection of real rights claims in property rights.This model is conducive to maintaining the right holder’s complete control over the property.The right to real rights claims is a system of property protection that arises from the protection of tangible objects,and its exercise can ensure the right holder’s control over a specifi c property.The right to real rights claims is based on the eff ectiveness of property rights control.Accurately distinguishing between the right to real rights claims and the right to debt claims is of great signifi cance for understanding and grasping the role of the right to property claims in cases such as contract nullifi cation and revocation.The right to claim real rights rights is also diff erent from the right to claim compensation for infringement damages.China’s Civil Code on tort liability is based on the core principle of compensation for damages and has established a complete system for tort liability.The eff ective cooperation between the right to real rights claims and the right to compensation for infringement damages forms an eff ective protection of property rights.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第4期63-75,共13页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
基金
中国人民大学重大项目(22XNLG01)的阶段性成果
关键词
物权请求权
支配权
债权请求权
侵权损害赔偿请求权
Rights to Real Rights Claim
Right to Control
Right to Claim Debt
Right to Claim Compensation for Infringement Damages
作者简介
王利明,中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心研究员,中国人民大学法学院教授。
