摘要
基于强可持续研究范式,以生态经济学和可持续发展理论为基础,运用两阶段网络Super-EBM模型进行绩效测算和评价,打开生态福利转化过程的'黑箱',基于综合福利视角将生态文明建设绩效进一步分解为生态经济效率和经济福利效率,实证研究部分选取2006-2015年的时间序列数据对中国'十一五'和'十二五'期间的生态文明建设绩效水平进行纵向分析,与此同时,选取42个国家2014年的截面数据进行横向的国际对比研究。研究表明:(1)'十一五'到'十二五'期间,中国生态文明建设绩效(0.986)整体水平一般,均未实现DEA有效,但'十二五'期间已呈现出逐年改善的利好趋势。国际比较层面,瑞士(1.647)、印度尼西亚(1.365)、爱尔兰(1.039)依次排名前三位,中国(0.297)排名相对靠后,位列倒数第二。各国之间差异较大,总体上呈现出'OECD国家(0.677)最高、G20国家(0.611)次之、金砖国家(0.417)最低'的态势。(2)从分阶段效率来看,无论是纵向分析还是横向对比,均发现第一阶段的生态经济效率明显低于第二阶段的经济福利效率,生态经济效率偏低是导致生态文明建设绩效总体水平偏低的主要原因。(3)与传统的单阶段、径向或非径向DEA模型相比,两阶段网络Super-EBM模型综合考虑了径向和松弛变量问题,测算出来的效率值更为精确,能够更为客观地反映现实。同时,对于其他领域涉及两阶段或多阶段生产系统的效率或绩效评估具有较好的借鉴价值。最后,根据上述结论提出相应的政策建议。
This study,based on a strong sustainability paradigm guided by ecological economics and sustainable development theory,aims at measuring the ecological civilization construction performance of China during 2006-2015 by means of two-stage network SuperEBM model from the perspective of overall well-being,and then an international comparison among 42 countries in 2014 is conducted accordingly.The employment of two-stage network DEA model is to open the'black box'during the ecological well-being transformation process.Thus,the ecological civilization construction performance is divided into two parts,namely ecological economy efficiency and economy well-being efficiency.The empirical results indicate that:(1)The overall efficiency of China during 2006-2015 is 0.986,which is at a relatively low level,and no single one of the ten DMUs performs efficiently in terms of the DEA efficiency value,while the overall efficiency is getting better during the 12 th Five-Year Plan period(2011-2015).At the global level,Switzerland(1.647),Indonesia(1.365)and Ireland(1.039)ranked top three in terms of overall efficiency among 42 countries in 2014,while China(0.297)ranked the last but one with a very low efficiency.In addition,there are great differences between countries,showing a trend characterized by'OECD countries(0.677)rank top,G20 countries(0.611)rank second and BRICS countries(0.417)the last'.(2)According to the efficiency of each stage,the ecological economy efficiency in the first stage is apparently lower than the economy well-being efficiency in the second stage,and the relatively low ecological economy efficiency mainly contributes to the low performance of ecological civilization construction at the whole level.(3)The two-stage network Super-EBM model with the consideration of both radial and slacks issues can provide more accurate and near-factual result when compared to the traditional DEA models.Besides,the network Super-EBM model enjoys a good reference on efficiency or performance assessment in other similar fields that involve two or more stages.Finally,some specific suggestions are proposed in accordance with the aforementioned conclusions.
作者
龙亮军
LONG Liang-jun(Institute for Contemporary China Studies,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;School of Public Policy&Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
出处
《自然资源学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2019年第6期1259-1272,共14页
Journal of Natural Resources
基金
中国博士后科学基金项目(2018M631504)
关键词
强可持续
生态福利
生态文明建设绩效
网络Super-EBM模型
国际比较
strong sustainability
ecological well-being
ecological civilization construction performance
network Super-EBM model
international comparison
作者简介
龙亮军(1988-),男,江西永新人,博士,助理研究员,研究方向为生态文明建设与可持续发展,E-mail:alan_long888@163.com
