摘要
1979年至2018年,国家基于对权力的限制和人权的保障,构建了'过程—结果'的刑事审讯双重控制机制。然而经过40年的构建,刑事审讯控制体系仍不完善。虽然刑讯逼供很少发生,但审讯违法问题依然存在,审讯的人员、时间、地点不合法等程序性违法问题依旧频繁出现。为了达到'既获得口供,审讯又不违法'的目的,应及时立法完善全程录音录像、界定审讯时间、规范律师介入的审讯程序,赋予犯罪嫌疑人及被告人沉默权以及严格排除非法审讯获得的证据。
From 1979 to 2018,the State constructed a dual control mechanism for criminal trials based on the restriction of power and the guarantee of human rights,'process-result'.However,after 40 years of construction,the criminal trial control system is still incomplete.Although extorting a confession by torture is rare,the problem of illegal trial still exists:interrogator,time,illegal place and other procedural illegal issues still occur frequently.For the goal of'obtaining a confession without breaking the law',the legislation should perfect the whole process of recording,defining the interrogation time,standardizing the procedure of interrogation,endow the criminal suspect and the defendant with the silence right and strictly excluding the evidence obtained from the illegal trial.
作者
陈鲜瑜
王勇
CHEN Xian-yu;WANG Yong(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120)
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2019年第2期88-94,共7页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
基金
2014年度重庆市社会科学规划项目“刑讯逼供的国家治理及其效果评估研究”(2014PY28)的成果
关键词
刑事审讯
审讯程序违法
审讯方法违法
法律衍变
criminal trial
illegal interrogation procedures
illegal interrogation methods
law evolution
作者简介
陈鲜瑜(1995—),女,西南政法大学刑事侦查学院2018级硕士研究生,贵州贵阳人;王勇(1964—),男,重庆巴中人,西南政法大学刑事侦查学院副教授,硕士研究生导师,主要从事刑事侦查学研究。
