摘要
理论上,合并仲裁区别于第三方当事人加入程序,也区别于合并审理、合并提出请求。强制合并仲裁的争议集中于当事人意思自治、仲裁保密性和决定主体权力方面,但意思自治并非凌驾于公共利益和效率价值之上的绝对性原则,当事人利益中亦存在对合并仲裁的内生需求。应当允许当事人反向协商一致、排除涉多方当事人的情形,并以仲裁庭成立为节点细化决定主体。实践中,强制合并仲裁可能面临承认与执行问题、限制当事人程序权利问题,应当完善具体规则,分析争议关联性、仲裁协议兼容性,审慎考察仲裁范围和当事人意图。应设置有利于同一仲裁庭审理案件的组庭规则,赋予当事人异议权,从而保障其程序权利。
Theoretically,consolidation of arbitration proceedings is conceptually distinguished from joinder of procedures,consolidated hearings and adding claims in multi-contractdisputes.Controversies regarding mandatory consolidation primarily involve three dimensions:private autonomy,confidentiality of arbitration and the power to consolidate.Notably,private autonomy does not constitute an absolute principle that su⁃persedes public interest and efficiency value.Demands for consolidation may also exist within parties’own interests.Relevant rules should permit parties to exclude consolidation through consensus,exclude the mandatory consolidation under multi-party circumstances,and clarifying the authority to consolidation deci⁃sion with reference to the timing of tribunal constitution.Practically,mandatory consolidation may encoun⁃ter challenges in recognition and enforcement,and resulted in risks of infringing procedural rights.Regula⁃tory improvements should be made regarding the requirements to consider the connectivity of disputes and the compatibility of arbitration agreements in order to examine the arbitral scope and parties’intent.Pro⁃cedural improvements should include:(1)constitution rules conducive to maintaining the same arbitral tri⁃bunal and(2)granting parties the right to raise objections.
作者
蒋舟与
Jiang Zhouyu(Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072)
出处
《安徽警官职业学院学报》
2025年第3期9-16,共8页
Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词
多合同争议
强制合并仲裁
意思自治
multi-contract disputes
mandatory consolidation
private autonomy
作者简介
蒋舟与(1999-),女,湖南常德人,武汉大学国际法研究所2022级硕士研究生。研究方向:国际私法、争议解决。
