摘要
相较于在司法领域的方兴未艾,数字正义在立法领域似乎鲜见身影。从语义出发,立法场景的数字正义存在工具维度的“借由数字技术来达致正义”和价值维度的“融贯数字社会来孕育正义”两层语义。从数字正义的生命周期入手,立法领域下的数字正义存在需求“雪藏”、生成“难产”、落地“偏颇”三重现实境遇。对此,借由沃尔德伦立法程序法理并加之进行“关系-沟通-程序”的数字化改造,或许能为数字时代迎回立法尊严和实现数字正义另辟蹊径。在关系维度,需要以数字理性尊重分歧的存在、以数字技术确保分歧的显露、以数字正义弥合分歧的裂隙,最终形成社会媒介意义上的互动关系。在沟通维度,需要加强在法律案形成阶段的专家论证、在法律案公布阶段的全民论证、在法律案表决阶段的代表论证,最终通过数字时代法律议论的主体间性使议题的可废止性为立法最终议案的形成进行正当化的加持和助推。在程序维度,需要通过理念融合和具体对接促进法律性正当程序和技术性正当程序的深度耦合,从而为良法善治的实现进行制度供给和程序保障,最终助力数字正义在立法领域的落地与具化。
Compared with the ascendant in the judicial field,digital justice seems to be rare in the legislative field.From the semantic point of view,the digital justice in the legislative scene has two levels of semantics:the tool dimension of"achieving justice through digital technology"and the value dimension of"integrating digital society to nurture justice".Starting from the life cycle of digital justice,there are three realistic situations of digital justice in the legislative field:Its demand is being shelved,its generation is"difficult to produce",and it implementation is"biased".In this regard,the digital transformation of"relationship-communication-procedure"based on the jurisprudence of Waldron's legislative procedure may be a new way to embrace the dignity of legislation and realize digital justice in the digital age.In the dimension of relationship,we need to respect the existence of differences with digital rationality,ensure the exposure of differences with digital technology,and bridge the gaps of differences with digital justice,and finally form an interactive relationship in the sense of social media.In the communication dimension,it is necessary to strengthen the expert argumentation in the formation stage of the legal case,the national argumentation in the publication stage of the legal case and the representative argumentation in the voting stage of the legal case.Finally,through the intersubjectivity of legal discussion in the digital age,the abolishment of the topic will be justified and boosted for the final legislative bill.In the procedural dimension,it is necessary to promote the deep coupling of legal due process and technical due process through the integration of ideas and concrete docking,so as to provide system supply and procedural guarantee for the realization of good law and good governance,and finally help the implementation and materialization of digital justice in the legislative field.
出处
《中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2025年第4期63-78,共16页
Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大专项项目“核心价值观融入法治建设研究:以公正司法为中心的考察”(项目编号:17VHJ007)
福建省习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心2024年度研究基地专项“习近平法治思想中的权利观研究”
吉林省法学会法学研究项目“算法运作的权利风险及其法律规制研究”(项目编号:JFXH(2022)SLKT20)。
关键词
数字正义
法律制定
数字法学
立法法理
digital justice
law making
digital law
legislative jurisprudence
作者简介
郭小伟,上海交通大学凯原法学院、上海交通大学中国法与社会研究院,从事法学理论研究。
