期刊文献+

指向数学核心素养的课堂探究式教学——以“弧长和扇形面积”为例

ClassroomInquiry Teaching Centered on Mathematical Core Literacy:Taking"Arc Length and Sector Area"as an Example
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 数学核心素养是数学知识教学的目标点。探究式教学为学生提供思考与交流的平台,利于激发其求知欲和探索精神,是培养学生数学核心素养的一种重要途径。研究阐述了探究式教学的内涵及其与数学核心素养培养的关系,以“弧长和扇形面积”为例进行探究式教学设计,实施指向数学核心素养的探究式课堂教学。并探讨教学内容与核心素养的关联、公式内涵与教学的关联,以及学生探究意识和能力提升的途径。 Mathematical core literacy is the target point of teaching mathematical knowledge.Inquiry teaching provides a platform for students to think and communicate,which is conducive to stimulating their desire for knowledge and their spirit of exploration,and is an important way to cultivate students'core mathematical literacy.The connotation of inquiry teaching and its relationship with the cultivation of mathematical core literacy are described in this article.Taking"Arc Length and Sector Area"as an example of teaching design,and implements inquiry classroom teaching pointing to mathematical core literacy,the connection between the teaching content and the core literacy,the connotation of formulas and the teaching,and the way to enhance students'sense of inquiry and ability are also discussed.
作者 管油江 张和平 杨忠保 GUAN Youjiang;ZHANG Heping;YANG Zhongbao(School of Mathematics and Statistics,Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities,Duyun Guizhou 558000;School of Science,Kaili University,Kaili Guizhou 556011)
出处 《兴义民族师范学院学报》 2025年第2期103-109,共7页 Journal of Minzu Normal University of Xingyi
基金 2024年贵州省级“金课”(一流本科课程)项目“数学课程标准解读与教材分析”(项目编号:2024JKXX01127) 黔南民族师范学院2024年度教育硕士研究生教育质量工程项目“八年级学生几何直观培养的策略研究”(项目编号:2024zlxs17)。
关键词 数学核心素养 探究式教学 弧长 扇形面积 mathematical core literacy inquiry teaching arc length sector area
作者简介 管油江(1996-),男,贵州威宁人,黔南民族师范学院数学与统计学院硕士研究生,主要研究方向:数学教育;通讯作者:张和平(1974-),男,贵州从江人,博士,凯里学院教授,硕士生导师,主要研究方向:数学教育与测量。
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

  • 1辛继湘.让探究教学神形兼备[J].中国教育学刊,2005(1):34-37. 被引量:30
  • 2吴小君.优化题组设计 提高教学效率[J].中国校外教育,2008(6). 被引量:2
  • 3Minner D D, Levy A J, CenturyJ. Inquiry - based science in- struction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002 [J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010,47 ( 4 ) : 474- 496.
  • 4Goldston M J,Dantzler J,Day J,et al. A psychometric ap- proach to the development ofa 5E lesson plan scoring instrument for inquiry-based teaching [J]. Journal of Science Teacher Edu- cation, 2013,24(3 ) : 527-551.
  • 5Banchi H,Bell R. The Many Levels of Inquiry[J]. Science and Children, 2008,46( 2 ) : 26-29.
  • 6Hmelo-Silver C E. Problem-based learning:What and how do students learn? [J].Educational Psychology Review,2004,16 (3) :235-266.
  • 7Tamim S R, Grant M M. Definitions and uses: Case study of teachers implementing project-based learning [J]. Interdisci- plinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 2013, 7 ( 2 ) : 3.
  • 8Mostert M P. Challenges of Case-Based Teaching [J]. Be- havior Analyst Today, 2007,8 (4) : 434-442.
  • 9Moog R S,Spencer J N. Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) [M]. Oxford University Press, USA, 2008.
  • 10http ://www.discovery.utexas.edu/.

共引文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部