摘要
帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪在结构形态上呈现案件数量高位运行、以涉“两卡”案件为主、被告人“三低一高”、犯罪形态和方式选代升级等特征。该罪案件在司法处理中面临如何与上下游犯罪相协调、犯罪门槛低、相关规范复杂、体系治理不完善等问题。在司法认定上应把握该罪的独立性,依法认定“明知他人利用信息网络实施犯罪”与提供“两卡”等帮信行为,做好与关联犯罪的区分。应切实践行宽严相济刑事政策,做好行刑衔接,推动刑事禁令的落实。
The crime of helping information network criminal activities presents the characteristics of large number of cases,the majority of cases involving"two cards"(i.e.SIM cards and bank cards),"three lows and one high"of the defendant(i.e.low in terms of age,educational level,and income;high in the number of first-time offenders),iterative upgrading of criminal forms and methods,and so on.In judicial practice,the treatment of the crime faces such problems as coordination with upstream and downstream crimes,low incrimination standards,relevant norms complex,and imperfect systematic regulation.In the determination of the crime,we should focus on the stand-alone nature of the crime,make the finding of"clearly knowing that someone is committing a crime by using an information network"and providing"two cards"or other aiding actions according to the law,and distinguish it from related crimes.We should earnestly implement the criminal policy of combining leniency with rigidity,make good connection between administrative sanction and criminal punishment,and promote the implementation of criminal injunctions.
作者
最高人民法院刑事审判第三庭课题组
The Research Group of the Third Criminal Division of the Supreme People's Court
出处
《数字法治》
2025年第1期66-74,共9页
DIGITAL LAW
作者简介
最高人民法院刑事审判第三庭课题组成员:陈鸿翔(最高人民法院刑事审判第三庭庭长)、翟超(最高人民法院刑事审判第三庭副庭长)、陈攀(最高人民法院刑事审判第三庭审判长)、王珂(最高人民法院刑事审判第三庭审判长)、王肃之(最高人民法院四级调研员)、王洋(最高人民法院刑事审判第三庭法官助理)。
